Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Administration Admits to Court: Under Obamacare, Select Group Can Get Health Care, Not Pay for It,
Terence P. Jeffrey ^ | 3/27/12 | CNSNewa

Posted on 03/27/2012 11:21:33 AM PDT by Nachum

(CNSNews.com) - President Barack Obama has justified the mandate in his health-care law that requires individuals to buy health insurance by arguing that it will eliminate free riders—that is, people who get health care (often from emergency rooms) but, lacking insurance, never pay anything back into the health-care system.

"So that's why the individual mandate's important," Obama explained in a speech on Aug. 15, 2011.

"Because the basic theory is, look, everybody here at some point or another is going to need medical care, and you can't be a free-rider on everybody else," said Obama. "You can't not have health insurance, then go to the emergency room, and each of us, who've don the responsible thing and have health insurance, suddenly we now have to pay the premiums for you. That's not fair. So, if you can afford it, you should get health insurance just like you get car insurance."

However, in the Supreme Court on Monday, Justice Samuel Alito forced President Barack Obama’s solicitor general, Donald Verrilli, to admit that under Obamacare these free riders will not be eliminated despite the individual mandate.

For an elite group—including people eligible for Medicaid who don’t sign up for it and people whose health care expenses exceed 8 percent of their income—the Obamacare mandate is no mandate and the penalty is neither a penalty nor a tax because they are not required to pay it, period.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnsnews.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: insurance; marxism; obamacare; penalty; redistributewealth; shariaexempt
Full title: Administration Admits to Court: Under Obamacare, Select Group Can Get Health Care, Not Pay for It, Not Buy Insurance, Not Pay Penalty

The dark side I feel in this one...

1 posted on 03/27/2012 11:21:41 AM PDT by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; EricTheRed_VocalMinority; ...

The list, Ping

Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list

http://www.nachumlist.com/


2 posted on 03/27/2012 11:23:19 AM PDT by Nachum (The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

The idiot for the Adminstration defense also pretend the group exempt from this mandate was small, when in fact it numbers over 1,000 groups.
Not to mention that some religious objections are treated “more equal that others”.


3 posted on 03/27/2012 11:25:07 AM PDT by G Larry (We are NOT obliged to carry the snake in our pocket and then dismiss the bites as natural behavior.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

For an elite group— i.e. illegals


4 posted on 03/27/2012 11:26:07 AM PDT by mouse1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Don’t care what 0bama says.
Anything out of his mouth is with forked-tongue, smoke and mirrors.


5 posted on 03/27/2012 11:33:23 AM PDT by TribalPrincess2U (Anyone not wanting an ID or purple thumb to vote isn't worthy of voting privilege.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

you can’t be a free-rider on everybody else-———

Well except for illegal aliens, Muslims etc are free riding off of the taxpayers now. And all Obamacare does it give it to millions more of em.


6 posted on 03/27/2012 11:43:27 AM PDT by Freddd (NoPA ngineers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
That nasty equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment comes to mind.
7 posted on 03/27/2012 11:48:45 AM PDT by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

I am shocked!

Of course it a giant vote buy.

Another burden on the middle class that cannot afford teams of tax lawyers to hide or delay income.

Buffet and is 15% tax rates.

We cover the other the shortages.


8 posted on 03/27/2012 12:11:14 PM PDT by NoLibZone (When will Obama call Trayvon's mom? He was quick to call Sandra Fluke.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Back in the day, Obama was (and probably still is) a member of the New Black Panthers. Gee, can’t imagine who’s pushing all this hooha...


9 posted on 03/27/2012 12:32:44 PM PDT by bgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Yes, low income people will receive a “subsidy”, which means this is, like most democratic initiatives, a redistributive program. This puts the lie to their claim that they are trying to create a better health insurance marketplace. This is just more redistribution of wealth.


10 posted on 03/27/2012 12:36:14 PM PDT by mtrott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

I wish our elected Republicans would work as hard as Justice Alito did to expose Obama lies.


11 posted on 03/27/2012 1:19:37 PM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

No real surprise. Lenin said it first; the only difference between Lenin and Obama is the size of the group sucking away at the public teat.


12 posted on 03/27/2012 2:20:48 PM PDT by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Myrddin

That nasty equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment comes to mind.

If Obamacare gets past the USSC as constitutional wouldn’t this be the next challenge. Where is the equal protection when so many are exempt from paying anything for premiums or penalties?


13 posted on 03/27/2012 4:04:50 PM PDT by Joan Kerrey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Joan Kerrey
I'm surprised it hasn't been considered already. Let's see what tomorrow brings.
14 posted on 03/27/2012 6:00:32 PM PDT by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Joan Kerrey

I would think these people, those exempt from paying anything, would go to the bottom of the pile. The ones that aren’t contributing will be behind those that are paying the bills when it comes to getting something, for example, like an organ transplant. Doesn’t that make sense? If you want a system like this to survive, wouldn’t you give first consideration to those that are paying the bills and contributing over those that are not?


15 posted on 03/27/2012 7:36:43 PM PDT by MagnoliaB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: TribalPrincess2U

Don’t care what 0bama says.
Anything out of his mouth is with forked-tongue, smoke and mirrors.


One can see the slime ooze out of his skin. He is an evil, evil creature. Repulsive doesn’t begin to describe him.


16 posted on 03/27/2012 8:28:37 PM PDT by unkus (Silence Is Consent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson