Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Long article by Orly Taitz in Pravda. Irony, don't escape me now.
1 posted on 03/27/2012 2:06:03 AM PDT by Flotsam_Jetsome
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: LucyT; null and void; Brown Deer; melancholy

Orly ping.


2 posted on 03/27/2012 2:07:47 AM PDT by Flotsam_Jetsome (If not you, who? If not now, when?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Flotsam_Jetsome

That dang SSN# is a pesky problem indeed.


3 posted on 03/27/2012 2:24:50 AM PDT by CharlesThe Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Flotsam_Jetsome
I wish foreign governments would start questioning his legitimacy as the leader of the United States. Could be that any treaty they enter into is or would be null and void. How would that be for a constitutional crisis.
9 posted on 03/27/2012 4:01:26 AM PDT by WesternPacific (Deafness has its Advantages)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Flotsam_Jetsome

Has anyone addressed the possibility that 1890 is a typo of 1980?


10 posted on 03/27/2012 4:05:43 AM PDT by TexasVoter (No Constitution? No Union!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Flotsam_Jetsome

“Obama was never a resident of Connecticut and there is no legitimate reason for him to have this number.”

It is common for an unaccompanied alien child arriving in America to be placed within the Federal Foster Care system. Once family relationships are identified, the child can be placed with a family member. But the Federal Foster Care contractor retains legal custody of the child.

In BHO’s II case, Catholic Social Services of Connecticut retained legal custody of BHO II until he was 18. His grandmother was appointed as his guardian.

These facts are proof BHO II is ineligible because he was an alien when he reached the age of majority, so it is ignored and dismissed.


11 posted on 03/27/2012 4:06:41 AM PDT by SvenMagnussen (What would MacGyver do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Flotsam_Jetsome; LucyT; Berlin_Freeper; Hotlanta Mike; Silentgypsy; repubmom; HANG THE EXPENSE; ...
Ping......................

Long article by Orly Taitz in Pravda. Irony, don't escape me now.

There we go again; 0b0z0's SS # by Orly in Pravda! Going around the MSM via Pravda.

Our free press at its best! /s

17 posted on 03/27/2012 5:19:02 AM PDT by melancholy (Professor Alinsky, Enslavement Specialist, Ph.D in L0w and H0lder)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Flotsam_Jetsome

I’m willing to bet a whole lotta of “our” politicians...federal, state and local...don’t have “valid” SS #’s....that’s how they get around paying those pesky taxes....


18 posted on 03/27/2012 5:32:15 AM PDT by mo (If you understand, no explanation is needed. If you don't understand, no explanation is possible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Flotsam_Jetsome

I think somebody once pointed out that Obama’s SSN could be the result of an error made by a bureaucrat in an era when such things were generated and assigned by hand - no personal computers, just card- and tape-fed monsters. I forget the exact content, but there was like a one digit difference from his SSN being “valid” for his alleged birthplace, Hawaii.


21 posted on 03/27/2012 7:01:05 AM PDT by Little Ray (FOR the best Conservative in the Primary; AGAINST Obama in the General.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Flotsam_Jetsome
“We know that this number was assigned to a resident of Connecticut born in 1890.”

This claim is false. “We” know no such thing. Orly's claim doesn't have a chance of holding up in any legal proceeding (and has failed repeatedly in court to be considered as evidence) because it fails to meet the most rudimentary requirements under the rules of evidence. The 1890 claim is based on a stray notation of one computer printout as being “associated with” this number.

Only further discovery of Social Security records under court order can establish whether the 1890 date means anything of probative value.

The CT SSN was shown to have been issued in 1977 because the numbers of deceased individuals close to Barry's have been disclosed from that year. Given Barry's close association with identity thieves and forgers Ayers and his wife going back to 1980 I regard it as most probable that the Ayers technique of obtaining SS#s for dead babies was most likely used to link up Barry with this number in the early 1980’s.

26 posted on 03/27/2012 8:59:12 AM PDT by Seizethecarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Flotsam_Jetsome

Considering Orly has expressed great disdain for the former Soviet Union, and her love of freedom in the United States, her Irony Meter must be absolutely busted it got pinged over so hard. Its bad enough for me, and I didn’t live under communism or it’s fall like she did.


29 posted on 03/27/2012 11:59:06 AM PDT by Danae (Anail nathrach, ortha bhais is beatha, do cheal deanaimh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson