Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How Can We Keep The 'Wolf In Sheep's Clothing' At Bay?
Family Security Matters ^ | March 26, 2012 | Lt. Colonel James G. Zumwalt, USMC (ret)

Posted on 03/26/2012 6:49:29 AM PDT by Cocoa2012

There have been numerous incidents in Afghanistan over the years involving a "wolf in sheep's clothing" by which a perceived friend, in actuality, is the foe.

Kabul has proven incompetent at weeding this danger from among its own troops.

Most recently, after the burning of the Korans, just such a wolf-in-sheep's-clothing incident occurred when two U.S. military officers were shot dead from behind while at their desks in what was a very secure Afghan ministry office.

An absence of trust for our Afghan allies has long been a factor in the U.S. relationship with them -- even before the Koran burning incident and massacre contributed to their distrust toward the Americans.

This brings us back to the story about the Iraqi safe house. The Special Forces unit had been set up. As information about the scheduled U.S. operation was shared with Iraqi allies, an Iraqi wolf-in-sheep's clothing reported it to al-Qaida. Militants rigged the house with explosives in anticipation of luring the Special Forces unit in.

Had it not been for a seasoned veteran's ability to sense danger, dozens of U.S. soldiers would have died.www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/pub_detail.asp?id=11668

(Excerpt) Read more at familysecuritymatters.org ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: heroes; navy; seals; war
Here’s one plot to murder Americans in Afghanistan that didn’t work – not because of sound U.S. policy but because of one seasoned veteran's ability to sense danger.
1 posted on 03/26/2012 6:49:40 AM PDT by Cocoa2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cocoa2012

What about the wolf in the Oval Office?


2 posted on 03/26/2012 6:50:58 AM PDT by RoosterRedux (Obama: "Who will rid me of this nettlesome Newt?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

Dictator Baby-Doc Barack has ALWAYS ignored The US Constitution, ESPECIALLY with Obama”care.”

The cancer of Obama”care” now extends to Obama last week choosing a “Public health expert” for the World Bank Presidency.
_______

The major problem with THE NINE SUPREMES is that they are chosen for political reasons by the POTUS, and then they vote as an un-accountable democracy, for a Nation that is NOT a Democracy, but a REPUBLIC.

As a result, THE NINE SUPREMES commonly vote 5 to 4 on most issues. Constitutionality is seldom a consideration, and their up-coming ruling on Obama”care” will prove my point.

Now is the time to stand and deliver to address our grievances to the dictates of the Left.

Oppose the dictates of Dictator Baby-Doc Barack!

Our ONLY chance to ABOLISH Obama”care” rests with THE NINE SUPREMES, because Romney will be defeated by Obama.

IMHO, if Romney is anointed as the RNC Nominee, THE main issue in the National Election, Obama”care,” will be taken off the campaign table. Hence, Romney will not only lose, but suffer another crushing, and sadly typical, RINO defeat.

To those who want poster ideas, here are a few ideas for demonstration posters:

Obama”care” was robo-signed by Congress, and is therefore illegal.

Obama”care” was 2700 pages long, and is still being written, but not by Congress: witness the forced contraception coverage recently added by HHS Regulators.

Obama”care” has caused “The Catholic Spring.”

Obama”care” reduces competition, and therefore is illegal by the 1890 Sherman Anti-Trust Law.

Obama”care” is designed to be a US Federal Government monopoly, with no competition.

Obama”care” also is illegal according to the US Constitution, because it violates our freedom of choice.

Will THE NINE SUPREMES notice any of these three violations? I seriously doubt it.

Impeached Bill Clinton proved that the US President is above US Federal Law, so anything that the President wants he gets, regardless of the Federal Laws that he has violated.


3 posted on 03/26/2012 6:53:09 AM PDT by Graewoulf (( obama"care" violates the 1890 Sherman Anti-Trust Law, AND is illegal by the U.S. Constitution.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux
What about the wolf in the Oval Office?

I wouldn't call him a wolf, more of a rabid Chihuahua. Still, those tiny little teeth can hurt now that the liberals gave him access to sensitive areas.

4 posted on 03/26/2012 7:07:03 AM PDT by Pollster1 (Natural born citizen of the USA, with the birth certificate to prove it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cocoa2012; Graewoulf
Thanks for posting the article and the point(s).

As a result, THE NINE SUPREMES commonly vote 5 to 4 on most issues. Constitutionality is seldom a consideration, and their up-coming ruling on Obama”care” will prove my point.

5 posted on 03/26/2012 7:20:12 AM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cocoa2012

The first rule of fighting is never let your guard down.


6 posted on 03/26/2012 8:36:50 AM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graewoulf
As a result, THE NINE SUPREMES commonly vote 5 to 4 on most issues. Constitutionality is seldom a consideration, and their up-coming ruling on Obama”care” will prove my point.

And a very important point it is.

7 posted on 03/26/2012 6:34:34 PM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson