The "Americans Elect" Farce

Townhall.com ^ | March 25, 2012 | Carol Platt Libau

[Kaslin]

Americans Elect is a new group desperately trying to gain attention to run a presidential candidate who is, we are told, a  "bipartisan choice."

Color me skeptical.  After reading Michael Warren's piece in The Weekly Standard, I was already sensing that the group -- with its disparate choices for president -- wasn't about any real policy ideas; "bipartisanship," after all, is about process (how one arrives at a decision) rather than about substance.  It sounds good, but doesn't mean anything on its own -- whether one favors bipartisan consensus depends on one's views on any given subject (i.e., pro-choicers and pro-lifers would disagree about whether a "bipartisan consensus" on a right to life is a good thing).

In a presidential election year -- when it's pretty much a referendum on the incumbent -- the effect of such a group is to siphon off and divide the opposition to the incumbent.  And in fact, that actually may well be the intent of Americans Elect.  Note that its political director is Darry Sragow, a committed Democrat whose path crossed with mine when I lived in California.  He's not the kind of guy who suddenly develops a burning desire to spearhead a movement for Donald Trump or Jon Huntsman.  And this year, no Democrat with any potential for significantly draining votes from the President would be willing to run -- it would be impossible for him (or her) to overcome the bitterness among the Democratic base that would result from a successful third party run against an incumbent fellow Democrat.

Upshot?  Americans Elect is nothing but a stalking horse to try to divide an anti-Obama majority from electing a Republican president.

[GeronL]

Is this related to the ‘reality show’ Presidential thing last time around?

[GeronL]

did Obama lose any counties in Louisiana like he did in Oklahoma?

[House Atreides]

“.......the effect of such a group is to siphon off and divide the opposition to the incumbent. And in fact, that actually may well be the intent of Americans Elect......
*********************************************************

“...to siphon off and divide the opposition to the incumbent...may well be the intent of Americans Elect..”

“may well be the intent”? It MOST DEFINITELY IS the intent. Any conservative who gets involved in this in any way is a fool.

[Forward the Light Brigade]

Stalking horse for the Progs and the Leftyists in an attempt to split the Republican vote—They were hoping to get Dr. Paul or the Trumpster or even Sarah Palin —they are too smart for that ploy. No this isn’t going to be a 3 way race—even if they would like it to be. How about Hillary Running as a 3rd Party?

[Impy]

According to Wikipedia some guy named John Wolfe Jr. got 12% to Obama’s 76% and beat Obama in 3 Parishes, Cameron, Grant, and LaSalle. Wofle, whoever the hell he is, is second behind Randal Terry in terms of votes for someone other than Obama. Terry wasn’t on the ballot in LA.

[no dems]

Well, Dennis Kucinich lost his Primary bid and he’s mad as hell. He is ultra-Liberal and is not happy with Obozo. How can we convince him to run as a Third Party Candidate? Anybody???