Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bert

I refuse to use the false term “Separation of church and state”

Today I use the far more accurate term “Protection of church from state”.


33 posted on 03/23/2012 5:33:39 AM PDT by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: cripplecreek

Having rolled that around, a thought. The protection of church from state seems to be a body of statutes and custom.

That body of law and custom is being steadily eroded. I believe the current President, his wife, his girls, every appointed lackey in the White House and many leaders of Congress have no religion in the sense of Christian or Jew.

They see their task as eroding that body of law and custom to destroy that which remains.

New York City is seen by Moslems as the great Satan, the fountain of sin. It and the other American cities are without religion. Having none, they are by definition sin ridden. To one with religion, that is bad. To one with no religion, the absence of all restraints is good.

It is my view that sadly, there is no great will to return the cities and thus America away from what are perceived as sinful ways. There is lack of conservative will to get it done.


42 posted on 03/23/2012 5:55:04 AM PDT by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 ..... Crucifixion is coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson