The fact that Zimmerman was bleeding just means that he was in a fight...it says nothing about who started it.
How many fights have you witnessed where the guy who started it ended up taking a beating? I've seen plenty.
Now, if you have an actual LEO doc or tape that has a witness saying that they saw Martin attack Zimmerman why not link to it?
You’re getting twisted up in your web of intrigue...keep your assertions straight.
Who started the fight? This is the last crumb the “hes guilty” crowd have left if they have read and studied all the available facts.
If you doubt that Zimmerman acted only in self defense please tell us exactly how to prove it, what is missing piece of the puzzle - if you know share it with us dummies who just have an acquired distrust of most of what we hear from the MSM, and their lackey the professional race-baiters.
How will we know anything different than what we know - come on and show the way.