Replies

Sorry but the fact that Zimmerman was bleeding does not prove that he was attacked. I've seen plenty of fights where the guy who started it got the shit kicked out of him.

I say that there is nothing in the released LEO docs and tapes that has any witness stating that Martin attacked Zimmerman. You say I'm wrong...how about you link to the tape and/or doc that does state that Martin attacked Zimmerman....go ahead, I'd really like to see it.

There is absolutely nothing in them that says or even implies that Zimmerman was attacked. Let me repeat that...absolutely nothing.

You better read it again.

It clearly stated Zimmerman was bleeding from the head and nose, was treated at scene, and while LEO's were on scene, Zimmerman was overheard by one of the LEO's, telling FD medics, "I kept yelling for someone to help, but no one helped me."

the fact that Zimmerman was bleeding does not prove that he was attacked

Hey slick, ya see your quote at the top of this post?

You never mentioned "proof". You stated, "There is absolutely nothing in them that says or even implies that Zimmerman was attacked. Let me repeat that...absolutely nothing."

So that makes you really stupid, or a damn liar due to the fact there IS something there, which clearly indicates the possibility he was attacked.

In your own words..."There is absolutely nothing in them that says or even implies..."

The police report contains descriptions of injuries that most certainly "imply" that Zimmerman was attacked.

You keep moving the goal posts, now you're saying there weren't any witnesses..."...nothing in the released LEO docs and tapes that has any witness stating that Martin attacked Zimmerman."

Which is it?

The public lynching of Mr. Zimmerman's reputation, without all of the facts, injecting speculation, hyperbole, personal interpretions, etc. here on FR is deplorable.

Inspector Clouseau could do a better job.

I think I'll repeat this for all to see. ______________________________________________________ There is absolutely nothing in them that says or even implies that Zimmerman was attacked. Let me repeat that...absolutely nothing.

You better read it again.

It clearly stated Zimmerman was bleeding from the head and nose, was treated at scene, and while LEO's were on scene, Zimmerman was overheard by one of the LEO's, telling FD medics, "I kept yelling for someone to help, but no one helped me."

the fact that Zimmerman was bleeding does not prove that he was attacked/

Hey slick, ya see your quote at the top of this post?

You never mentioned "proof". You stated, "There is absolutely nothing in them that says or even implies that Zimmerman was attacked. Let me repeat that...absolutely nothing."

So that makes you really stupid, or a damn liar due to the fact there IS something there, which clearly indicates the possibility he was attacked.

You guys better learn words mean thing, if ya try to weasel out, you're going to get called on it.

Zimmerman said he was attacked by Martin while he was returning to his SUV. Obviously, you don't believe him. Do you have any proof to the contrary. Isn't it up to the state to prove that Zimmerman is lying? How does Zimmerman prove that Martin attacked him?

Check out this video that speaks about corroborating witnesses