So: should a president's kid be allowed to go on class trips, or should he/she stay at home because of the added cost of security? Forget the Obamas; think of this as a policy call for future reference. There would be a Secret Service detail at ANY destination, not just Mexico. I don't know if the number mentioned in the article is unusually large or not. They're escorting a large group, and they have to be on duty around the clock. Are you arguing that president's kids should just stay home?
I would expect the detail for Mexico to be substantially larger than if they were going to, say, Italy or Germany.
Kidnapping for ransom is a major sport in Mexico.
I have no idea how or why Mexico was chosen as a destination for this year’s trip>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Very Bad idea. There are cogent reasons why there is a travel advisory concerning Mexico.
The truth about Mexico has not been reported by the MSM and the government of Mexico has a news blackout in place on the topic of its Drug Gangs, necessitating reporting by an illicit site;
When you see what is happening there ( BROWSE THE SITE) you would wonder why anyone would want to send their kid to Mexico.Sidwell parents must be extraordinarily ignorant. I never would have signed off on my kid going to Mexico now!!!
So: should a president’s kid be allowed to go on class trips, or should he/she stay at home because of the added cost of security? Forget the Obamas; think of this as a policy call for future reference. There would be a Secret Service detail at ANY destination, not just Mexico. I don’t know if the number mentioned in the article is unusually large or not. They’re escorting a large group, and they have to be on duty around the clock. Are you arguing that president’s kids should just stay home?