Norm — Sherm is no rat. He does pose opinions that we don’t like, but these are logically put together (like for instance, we don’t want to give a government the power to decide which religion to ban or not, do we?) — we are handicapped by our legal precedence, sense of justice and democracy —> but we can ban the philosophy of Islam on ground of violence.
In the general sense I agree. It’s not that I ‘want’ government to have that power, but when it comes to Islam, realistically, only government ‘can’ get rid of Islam from America.
To clarify, It must be made illegal, banned, etc - and such necessitates govt. intervention/votes/etc - for the laws and enforcement of them. As it stands, govt sues etc. every time a citizen stands up to stop the spread of islam sharia etc.
If govt can stop us, the reverse is also true.