Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AmericanInTokyo; VinL

What he refers to is rule 40 (b):

Each candidate for nomination for
President of the United States and Vice President of the
United States shall demonstrate the support of a
plurality of the delegates from each of five (5) or more
states, severally, prior to the presentation of the name of
that candidate for nomination.

This pretty well hoses a dark horse late entrant at the convention as well, I believe.


11 posted on 03/20/2012 9:49:44 PM PDT by Ingtar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Ingtar

I don’t doubt at all what you say. The rules are crazy.

But are you saying another candidate that has not been running cannot be introduced at a convention?


22 posted on 03/20/2012 10:09:13 PM PDT by berdie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Ingtar

There is a way to know yet... before the actual number of delegates “secured” by each candidate is known. ......This is why delegates has been the name of the game from the beginning.

This may also refer to the situation at the convention after voting is completed....... The number of delegates required to win is 1144..... It now appears that a further qualification is that the nominee win a plurality of the delegates in at least five States.

But I also hear Delegates can change the rules.


32 posted on 03/20/2012 10:23:01 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Ingtar

I don’t know if this applies to a floor fight. If true, Newt (or anyone else) can come in and contest during the second and later vote, as long as he surpasses a plurality of 5 state’s delegates.


37 posted on 03/20/2012 10:34:13 PM PDT by Thunder90 (Romney barely won in OH with a 12-1 money advantage, he can't beat Obama that way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Ingtar; AmericanInTokyo

Thanks, I knew what he was referring to, I’m aware of the Rule.

Relative to the question posed, it wasn’t necessary to address it in order to answer him. But, I appreciate you bringing it to my attention.


39 posted on 03/20/2012 10:38:03 PM PDT by VinL (It is better to suffer every wrong, than to consent to wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Ingtar

This would seem to restrict the VP nomination to a candidate that won at least 5 states as well. As of now wouldn’t that make the only possible tickets Romney/Santorum or Santorum/Romney?


67 posted on 03/21/2012 5:09:13 AM PDT by Hugin ("Most time a man'll tell you his bad intentions if you listen and let yourself hear"--Open Range)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Ingtar; AmericanInTokyo; VinL
What he refers to is rule 40 (b):

Each candidate for nomination for President of the United States and Vice President of the United States shall demonstrate the support of a plurality of the delegates from each of five (5) or more states, severally, prior to the presentation of the name of that candidate for nomination.

This pretty well hoses a dark horse late entrant at the convention as well, I believe.

After the first round of votes, if no candidate has greater than 50%, then any names for candidates can be thrown in the hat for the next round of votes.

75 posted on 03/21/2012 7:42:24 AM PDT by meadsjn (Sarah 2012, or sooner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Ingtar; AmericanInTokyo; VinL; berdie; caww; Thunder90; Hugin; meadsjn

I’m pretty sure this is just an additional requirement on top of the 1,144 delegates. I think any names can be offered, but to actually win the nomination, they would need 1,144 delegates plus at least 5 states where they had the most delegates.

http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/03/21/10793350-rnc-rule-means-hurdle-for-gingrich-convention-strategy

There is a caveat that could allow Gingrich to slip through. RNC press secretary Kirsten Kukowski told NBC News that a candidate may still be nominated at the convention if they are able to garner a plurality of five states on the floor. The only real road toward accomplishing that would involve capturing unbound delegates, who will be few and far between come August.


77 posted on 03/21/2012 8:58:01 AM PDT by JediJones (The Divided States of Obama's Declaration of Dependence: Death, Taxes and the Pursuit of Crappiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson