Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I didn't see anything posted about the Illinois election. I hope that this helps.

I have recently made it a practice to post comments in prominent political articles in major newspapers that are about to have a primary or caucus. (I have done so in newspapers in Tennessee, Alabama, Mississippi, Missouri, and Illinois. I attempted to do so in Puerto Rico, but their comments section appeared to be having some technical issues.) In these comments I give a list of reasons to vote for Rick Santorum. It has gone relatively smoothly. However, when I posted a comment in the Chicago Tribune, it was removed. I also noticed that they appeared to be systematically removing most of the pro-Santorum comments from the articles. The result is that most people looking at the comments would see almost entirely pro-Romney or anti-Santorum comments. It is their newspaper, and they have the legal right to do so, but it is somewhat revealing about their editorial processes and their ethics.

1 posted on 03/20/2012 5:25:58 PM PDT by Engraved-on-His-hands
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Engraved-on-His-hands

Like the Chicago Machine is going to allow an honest election... Obama wants Romney to be the Nominee. Why even pretend?


2 posted on 03/20/2012 5:35:26 PM PDT by Mechanicos (Why does the DOE have a SWAT Team?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Engraved-on-His-hands

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2861596/posts


3 posted on 03/20/2012 5:37:27 PM PDT by lonevoice (Klepto Baracka Marxo, impeach we much.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Engraved-on-His-hands

Illinois - back when I lived there in the 50s & 60s in nw suburbs - was controlled by Chicago lib voters, the way Pennsylvania has been/is controlled by Philadelphia and Pittsburgh.

Looks like lib-Mitt is pounding Newt & Rick, pretty badly. The Chicago Machine has done its work, again.


4 posted on 03/20/2012 5:37:41 PM PDT by Carriage Hill (I'll "vote for an orange juice can", over Barry 0bummer and another 4yrs of his Regime From Hell!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Engraved-on-His-hands

Early returns have Romney with a commanding lead, but most of these early votes are from Chicago, where Romney is strong. Although Romney will probably win comfortably, I expect the gap to close considerably as the night wears on.


5 posted on 03/20/2012 5:41:21 PM PDT by Engraved-on-His-hands
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Engraved-on-His-hands

Well, I voted for Newt at 6:02 a.m. this morning, just after the polls opened.


6 posted on 03/20/2012 5:41:55 PM PDT by ought-six ( Multiculturalism is national suicide, and political correctness is the cyanide capsule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Engraved-on-His-hands; Impy; BillyBoy; fieldmarshaldj
I voted for Rick Santorum and I stick by that vote.

Once again, my vote in this state doesn't matter...

So the Massachusetts Romneycare vs. Saul Alinsky Jr.

Oye, McCain2 it seems.

9 posted on 03/20/2012 5:44:28 PM PDT by Dengar01 (Go Bulls!!! Go Blackhawks!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Engraved-on-His-hands

We’re all peons now!


10 posted on 03/20/2012 5:45:49 PM PDT by Leep (Dueling tag lines=don't worry,you'll be a vegetable guy soon<>It's gonna be a Newt day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Engraved-on-His-hands

CBS TV News calls Illinois for Romney by nearly 2-1 over Santorum.

Paul 3rd

Gingrich 4th


17 posted on 03/20/2012 6:00:43 PM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Engraved-on-His-hands

“Otherwise, we’re just handing it to 0bummer for another 4yrs of Misery & Hell.”

The we you are speaking of is the establishmentarians like Coulter,Rove,Fox News and a way to many supposed “conservative” radio talkshow host.
Oh, and don’t forget the sheeple who buy into the narative.

The ‘E team’ got the idea in people’s heads early that he was the only one with the money and the infrastrusture in place to win.
They constantly promoted him as the inevidible winner. Even when he wasn’t.
In the Newspaper after each primary Romney was almost always front page with a big picture of him smiling. While the other candidates got small stock photos off to the side.
Sometimes no photo at all.

I’m going to vote. Just not for Romney. NEVER FOR ROMNEY!!! Even in an illutionary representive democracy I will vote.

I will write in Palin Gingrich Cain or Mark Levin.


21 posted on 03/21/2012 7:02:19 AM PDT by Leep (Dueling tag lines=don't worry,you'll be a vegetable guy soon<>It's gonna be a Newt day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Engraved-on-His-hands

I don’t like to be all sour grapes if we lose, but I truly do not feel chicago’s elections can be trusted. They always come out the way the liberal machine wishes.


24 posted on 03/21/2012 7:19:50 AM PDT by Yaelle (Santorum 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson