To: randita
Not a bad answer. I would have preferred something like “There is no such thing as free stuff. Only stuff that is stolen from other people..the government forcibly takes $1 from person A, and gives person B $0.50 worth of stuff..”
To: trappedincanuckistan
Your answer is much, much better
8 posted on
03/20/2012 1:16:36 PM PDT by
stephenjohnbanker
(God, family, country, mom, apple pie, the girl next door and a Ford F250 to pull my boat.)
To: trappedincanuckistan
Yes, Romney should have gone with something more in line with your answer. Romney’s answer is a non-paid-for Obama ad. Many people are looking for free stuff.
38 posted on
03/20/2012 1:52:54 PM PDT by
fhayek
To: trappedincanuckistan
Agreed.
I would have liked to hear “if you want free stuff at the expense of others, vote for Obama. If you want to be a burden on society, Obama’s your guy!”
50 posted on
03/20/2012 2:20:51 PM PDT by
Zeppelin
(Keep on FReepin' on...)
To: trappedincanuckistan
I like your answer too, and I’d even go so far as to suggest you could reduce that $0.50 worth of stuff for the $1.00 collected.
59 posted on
03/20/2012 2:38:56 PM PDT by
DoughtyOne
(I believe in Cap and Trade. I know, I know... Cap spending and trade Obama!)
To: trappedincanuckistan
Your answer is good....on paper. But not on the stump. Slogans must be short and catchy. “You want free stuff, vote for the other guy” works well.
66 posted on
03/20/2012 3:11:42 PM PDT by
citizen
(The Dims will all unite for Zero. We must soon unite behind our challenger and back him to victory!)
To: trappedincanuckistan
67 posted on
03/20/2012 3:24:21 PM PDT by
Liberty Valance
(Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson