Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GulfBreeze
While it may be clever for Romney to use it in a commercial. It is disingenuous for Drudge to tout it again and in such a front page blazing way.

"Disingenuous"?! What the heck does that mean?

Everyone knows that Drudge is supporting Mitt Romney. We can tweet, swat, stamp our feet and pout .... but that's not going to change who Drudge supports. And NO ... he doesn't have to be fair and balanced.

So let's exhale and save some strength. We've got a hell of a fight ahead of us.

47 posted on 03/19/2012 10:19:14 AM PDT by Right_in_Virginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: Right_in_Virginia

It’s still disingenuous. The definition can be found at either Webster.com or Dictionary.com .

Newt, BTW, was the first person to personally point out that Drudge was shilling for Romney. FWIW.


61 posted on 03/19/2012 11:55:12 AM PDT by GulfBreeze (Still a Santorum guy !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

To: Right_in_Virginia

It’s still disingenuous. The definition can be found at either Webster.com or Dictionary.com .

Newt, BTW, was the first person to personally point out that Drudge was shilling for Romney. FWIW.


62 posted on 03/19/2012 11:55:18 AM PDT by GulfBreeze (Still a Santorum guy !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson