Skip to comments.
All Odds Aside, G.O.P. Girding for Floor Fight
New York Times ^
Posted on 03/17/2012 5:07:29 PM PDT by Sub-Driver
All Odds Aside, G.O.P. Girding for Floor Fight By JEFF ZELENY and JIM RUTENBERG
CHICAGO For the first time in a generation, Republicans are preparing for the possibility that their presidential nomination could be decided at their national convention rather than on the campaign trail, a prospect that would upend one of the rituals of modern politics.
The race remains Mitt Romneys to lose, and if he continues to accumulate delegates at a steady clip starting with contests in Puerto Rico on Sunday and Illinois on Tuesday, he can still amass the 1,144 necessary to secure the nomination before the last primary, in Utah on June 26.
But as he struggles to win the hearts of conservative voters and hold off a challenge from Rick Santorum, party leaders, activists and the campaigns are for the first time taking seriously the possibility that neither he nor anyone else will get to that total.
In that case, the nomination would be decided by the more than 2,200 delegates from obscure local officials and activists to national figures who will attend the partys convention in Tampa, Fla., in late August.
They would embark on an unscripted, contentious and televised drama that has not played out in 36 years, a period in which both major party conventions have become slickly produced and highly choreographed pep rallies kicking off the general election campaign.
With that in mind, campaign and party lawyers are dusting off their party rule books, running through decades-old procedural arcana and studying the most recent convention-floor fight, between Ronald Reagan and President Gerald R. Ford in 1976. Republican officials also are bracing for the possibility of a prenomination clash between the partys establishment and members of the Tea Party movement...
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: brokeredconvention; holiestvsrichest; ideasvsideology; identitypolitics; kenyanbornmuzzie; mittromney; newtgingrich; ricksantorum; slimandnone; teaparty; teapartyisscrewed
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 last
To: Christie at the beach
I sent Gingrich’s campaign a donation recently so as to encourage him in his attempt to force a brokered convention. I don’t usually donate but I felt this reasoning (forcing a brokered convention) was important.
I would encourage other Freepers who want a brokered convention to do the same, regardless of their opinion of Gingrich.
www.newt.org
41
posted on
03/18/2012 8:35:12 AM PDT
by
bkopto
(Obama is merely a symptom of a more profound, systemic disease in American body politic.)
To: traditional1; babygene
Same here; Ill write-in before I vote for Romney-the-RINO, aka, the Chosen One of the Republican Establishment Elite.
Here's why I am NEVER NEVER and I do mean NOT EVER voting for that puke Romney.
Why I am NEVER voting for Romney, even if he is the GOP nominee (shudder)
Many people, online and in-person, have started to shrug and say, "Oh well. Looks like Romney's gonna get the Republican nomination. I'll have to hold my nose and vote for him, like I voted for McCain.and all the other RINOs the GOP have shoved at us. After all, if he's only 80-90% like Obama then he's at least a little better than him, right?"
WRONG. and heres why.
If Myth does 90% of what Zer0 does, he will do it WITH AN R NEXT TO HIS NAME.
What does this do? Well, Republicans in Congress who would otherwise balk at lib legislation if it were proposed by Zer0 WILL SIGN ON TO THE LEGISLATION BECAUSE IT IS PROPOSED BY THE LEADER OF THE GOP.
Imagine: amnesty, tax fairness, gutting the military and so much more ALL SAILING THROUGH CONGRESS because a Republican is at the helm of America. Contrast this with a second Obozo presidency where the GOP will dig in their heels and at least try to fight.
Yeah, I said it. An Obummer presidency is better for America than a Myth presidency (in the way that a cowpie sandwich is better than a meal of broken glass).
This is why we have to have a NOT-ROMNEY at the top of the ticket if we are to have any hope of digging America out of this hole were in. And if we don't, God help us... but I still WON'T vote for him. I'll vote for whichever acceptable, conservative 3rd party candidate is running (so my protest vote will have the most impact), or I'll write one in.
As JimRob says. Romneycare = Obamacare = Commiecare. NO ROMNEY, NO WAY!!
42
posted on
03/18/2012 9:03:29 AM PDT
by
VictoryGal
(Never give up, never surrender! REMEMBER NEDA)
To: TribalPrincess2U
> Its pretty much over for America.
As long as there is life left in my body, I’m going to keep fighting, whatever the odds.
Snap out of it and don’t give up. The GOP-E and liberal scum are all betting we’ll lose heart. Don’t give them what they want!
43
posted on
03/18/2012 9:08:52 AM PDT
by
VictoryGal
(Never give up, never surrender! REMEMBER NEDA)
To: Christie at the beach
I’ve learned to think for myself since 2008. Rush and the other establishment lapdogs will never scare me into voting for Willard Romney the father of U.S. socialized medicine. If he wins, Obamacare will live on and the GOP will be destroyed, or, at best, completely co-opted by the establishment.
Obama vs Romney is like asking the Rebel Alliance to vote for Emperor Palpatine or Darth Vader.
44
posted on
03/18/2012 4:49:49 PM PDT
by
Cato in PA
(1/26/12: Bloody Thursday)
To: Christie at the beach
The Fox people and Rush types will scare us into voting but will they be able to scare enough? That is the question.
Not now. Four years ago, 12 years ago, yes, but not now.
Many Conservatives (including myself) have finally woken up and realized that the only difference between a liberal with an (R) next to their name and a liberal with a (D) next to their name is how fast they will take us down the road to socialism. Both will do so, just at different speeds.
The people who still think that Romney or other liberals with (R) next to their names are somehow better than Obama are numerous, there is no doubt, but they will find out that if they want a Republican to win, they damn well better get a Conservative on the ballot.
In their ignorance, they think that not only is Obama better than a liberal with an (R) next to his name, but they think that Conservatives will bend over for the GOP and support a liberal with an (R) next to their name, and they will find out just how wrong they are.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson