Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PapaBear3625; LucyT; Brown Deer; maggief; Las Vegas Ron; manc; Candor7; onyx; Nachum; ...

and this, another post on DU:

“The Clinton amendment did not accomplish what the Obama one does.
Compare them side by side, and include the Reagan version and the 1950 act.

Certain key words have been changed. This EO does give the President powers the others did not.
This EO also is all inclusive which the others were not. This EO also gives the government the power to dictate to private businesses, issue guaranteed loans, and also ties up the banks in new and exciting ways.

Read all the versions and pay attention to any changes as they are very significant and far reaching. If Bush had done this I/We would be freaking out like never before, Obama doing this is a completely different story.

This was predicted / expected to happen after the election in November. Why he did it now is the most important question.
In actuality “National Defense” is only the premise used to enforce this order.

Read section 102 on the Clinton version, and the Obama version, the change was 1 word. That 1 word changes everything, and does change the EO to something completely different that is crafted of “need” as opposed to “Threat.

Need is a ubiquitous concept, threat is a very narrow one in comparison. That is only the second segment. Once you read the whole thing you understand the scope of it is unprecedented, and the very thing we need to neutralize the Conservative agenda, and ell the obstructionism practiced by the Republican congress.

We’ll see.

This is the move I have been waiting for, and hoping I was not imagining he would do this. I thought he would do it in December after a won second term. He must know something we don’t that allows him, or compels him to do it now.”


352 posted on 03/18/2012 10:04:36 AM PDT by mojitojoe (American by birth. Southern by the grace of God. Conservative by reason and logic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 333 | View Replies ]


To: mojitojoe
Quote from your DU Quote. It shows that totalitarianism is what the Obama movement is about. Historical analyisis of Obama's politics and mentality shows that he is fascist. Why is that important? We need to know the enemy to defeat him.Fascism can only be defeated using certain methods, for it usurps government from within.

The biggest hurdle is that Obama now has an iron grip on the public media.That grip needs to be destroyed.

Quote: "Need is a ubiquitous concept, threat is a very narrow one in comparison. That is only the second segment. Once you read the whole thing you understand the scope of it is unprecedented, and the very thing we need to neutralize the Conservative agenda, and ell ( sic "all) the obstructionism practiced by the Republican congress."

Note that COngress is no longer exercisioong the process of electoral democracy....rather it is "obstructionist." A mere inconvenience to "true governance." This is how desperate these fascists have become.

This my friend, is Fascism. The Obama movement is NOW no longer Democrat at all. Its fascist.And they all must be destroyed on the anvil of our Republic.This election is our last peaceful or semi peaceful chance. The riots for this summer are now being organiozed by Obama and his community workers.They plan on causing a backlash by patriots across the nation. Unions and minorities will be involved, as well as anarchists.

Photobucket

Photobucket

408 posted on 03/19/2012 6:28:03 AM PDT by Candor7 (Obama fascist info.. http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/05/barack_obama_the_quintessentia_1.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 352 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson