The accuser, Nadia Naffe.
Well, at least is better than a 'heart attack'
The piece at Mediaite...
http://www.mediaite.com/online/james-okeefe-accomplice-nadia-naffe-to-tell-all/
Gosh I wooonder how many millions George Soros is paying her, right?
Andrew dead, Rush almost knocked off, now this...
GOSH: IS THERE A PATTERN...?
Has Gloria Alred shown up yet?
David Brock has a million skeletons in his closet.You could start with his former sex “partner” Bill Grey, while Bill’s still alive and breathing. (That psychotic sociopath Brock is probably already planning to Breitbart him.)
Why isn’t someone investigating Brock, as well as the scores of total psychos and losers he employs. This could keep a dozen private investigating firms busy full-time for years. How about it, you rich people on the right? We need to fight fire with fire.
They can't do any better than this to destroy a truth seeker?
This isn't even worth a Bill Mayer comment.
The accuser, Nadia Naffe.
So.. chick agrees to stay in a barn, gets messed up, discovers missing panties.
Yeah, that’s tragic as all get out, I’ll tell ya what.
1. Drudge compromised somehow
2. Andrew dead
3. Rush almost knocked-off
4. O’Keefe now under attack
Rush always says, “The Left will ALWAYS tell you whom and what they fear...”
It appears that The Left really fears conservative MEDIA.
What are the odds they hate us? And Jim/John Thompson, Hmmmmm...?
LOL! So far, at least.
By the way, I'm surprised the scumbag Democrats haven't connected O'Keefe to the spy taping that led to the Clementi suicide.
They can't do any better than this to destroy a truth seeker?
This isn't even worth a Bill Mayer comment.
Fecal matters again.
Honey trap?
” Hell has no fury like a woman scorned. “ http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Congreve
Matt Drudge stole my panties.
They put her up in the barn, cause with that smile they thought she was a horse.
O’Keefe to the author of the hit piece:
“If you refuse to publish the fact this person was arrest for domestic violence in 2001 — public record, and you refuse to publish the fact this person sued the Bush/Cheney campaign in 2004, you will be acting in willful disregard for the truth.”
Basically - it appears she is one of those. Half her personal/business relationships end up in court.
Now - she has a story - years after event - of “missing panties and ..... something”. Doesn’t even have the guts to actually claim - well - anything.
Just a head case attention whore. So - of course - will get huge play from the media.
Perhaps she had just forgotten her panties hoping for more, but was rebuffed.
Since when did eyebrows start halfway up your forehead?
I have actually caught him stealing the socks out of my luggage too. And he stole my remote control! Oh no wait...here it is. Anyway, back to the socks...Oh, here they are.
Well, I am a drinker and...I was drinking, maybe I just forgot to pack them?...no! that couldn't be it. He stole them. I just know it.
That makes a lot more sense than me forgetting to pack them and then misremembering them as 'stolen' after waking up from a black-out night of drinking. I guess?