Economy Dents Obama’s Poll Numbers

National Review ^ | 03/15/2012 | Michael Barone

[SeekAndFind]

You can almost hear the note of surprise in their voices when you read the Washington Post and New York Times reporters’ stories on their papers’ latest political polls.

Surprise! Just when they thought that Barack Obama was pulling ahead, with positive job ratings, and just after the mainstream media have been savaging Republicans for two words Rush Limbaugh uttered on his radio program, Obama’s numbers seem to be tanking.

Actually, the numbers are not so striking or so surprising. The media narrative for the last four weeks has been that the president’s job approval has been rising in response to good economic news.

But the economic news has not been all that striking. We had a quarter in which economic growth reached 2.8 percent. We’ve had two months with job growth of better than 200,000.

Peachy. But in 1983, the year before Ronald Reagan’s reelection, the gross domestic product rose 8.9 percent not just for one quarter but over the whole year. There were two months when job growth was 729,000 and 660,000.

That’s the kind of economic recovery that enables an incumbent president’s campaign to run a credible “Morning in America” ad. If the Obama campaign ran one now, it would be fodder for Saturday Night Live and Jon Stewart.

Nor was the supposed spike in Obama’s job rating so high. In the Real Clear Politics average of recent polls, it never got better than 49 percent approve, 47 percent disapprove.

Now the ABC/Washington Post poll has it at 46–50 and the CBS/New York Times poll at 41–47. Rasmussen Reports tracking has it at 47–52.

That downtick is not huge, though it seems to be offsetting the February uptick. Some basic factors are still working for Obama. Americans want to think well of their presidents; this helped Bill Clinton in 1996 and George W. Bush in 2004. Many voters do not want to be seen as rejecting the first black president.

On the other hand, Obama’s major policies are unpopular. You can gauge that by the number of words devoted to the stimulus package in his last State of the Union: zero.

Or by the persistent unpopularity of Obamacare. Or by the fact that 50 percent in the ABC/WaPo poll strongly disapproved of his handling of the economy.

Or by the response to Democrats’ claims that Republicans were waging a “war on women” by opposing the administration’s mandate that religious-affiliated organizations’ insurance policies cover birth control.

The New York Times in its print article buried its own results, as blogger Mickey Kaus noted. Its poll showed women favored allowing religious organizations to opt out of such coverage by a 53–38 percent margin. The margin for men and women together was 57–36 percent.

Four-dollar-gas prices surely took a toll on the president’s numbers as well, despite his repeated boasts that domestic oil production is up.

Americans know the president cannot set the price at the pump. But they are also apparently aware that his administration shut down oil production in the Gulf of Mexico and has been slow-walking drilling permits, that it banned offshore drilling over other coasts, and that it denied a permit for the Keystone XL pipeline.

The Keystone denial remains astonishing for reasons that, I suspect, any Democratic pollster would tell you if you could promise absolute confidentiality.

A February Pew poll showed a 42 to 15 percent margin for building the pipeline. The fact that Obama was lobbying Senate Democrats last week to block the pipeline and that all but three voted to do so won’t help the president or his party.

Last year, I described the Keystone decision as a “no-brainer.” It never occurred to me that Obama would decide to favor the rich environmentalists he encounters at fundraisers over the mass of the American people who want the Canadian oil and the construction jobs the pipeline would supply.

Obama’s February uptick and March downtick in the polls will probably not be the last fluctuation we will see in his political standing.

Opinion about Mitt Romney, who at this writing seems virtually certain to be the Republican nominee, could fluctuate even more. Events could shift opinion, too.

But some fundamentals are unlikely to change. Voters’ focus is on economic issues and on these most oppose the president’s policies. His media cheerleaders who thought his February numbers meant the election was over were fooling themselves.

— Michael Barone is senior political analyst for the Washington Examiner

[ScottinVA]

This is a bit outdated. The more recent numbers for Obama are more favorable to him. Would be nice if somehow the word could get out to the masses how Obamacare will now cost $1.76 trillion, vs. the $940 billion we were led to believe...

... oh wait... 49.5% aren’t taxpayers... why would they care?

[Puppage]

... oh wait... 49.5% aren’t taxpayers... why would they care?

And, THERE ya have it.

[brownsfan]

The GOP doesn’t want the White House.

A president who couldn’t be weaker, with numbers that no incumbent has overcome, will win re-election.

The GOP wants control of Congress, that’s all.

[jveritas]

As long as the gas price is high and with it all consumer goods prices are high then the possibility of Obama winning re-election is less than 50% even with someone like Romney as the Republican nominee. At the end events on the ground determine who win the elections and if the current events on the ground remain unchanged until elections day then Obama would most likely lose his re-election…It is that simple…

[SeekAndFind]

RE: This is a bit outdated. The more recent numbers for Obama are more favorable to him.

_________________________________

Actually we are aware of the so-called bump up to 50% in Obama’s approval ratings. Two polls show that in fact — PEW and Reuters/Ipsos

See here for a dissection of how bogus these poll numbers are:

http://hotair.com/archives/2012/03/14/shocker-poll-with-51-democrats-gives-obama-50-approval-rating/

and here:

http://hotair.com/archives/2012/03/14/pew-poll-puts-obama-approval-at-5041/

EXCERPT:

_____________________________

You’d normally see me analyze the sample type, size, and composition for a critical analysis of whether this particular poll is reliably predictive. Oddly, Reuters doesn’t provide a link for its readers to peruse the data set — but that’s no problem, as it turns out, because Reuters provides its own credibility-killing data at the end of its report:

The Reuters/Ipsos telephone poll of 1,084 adults included 554 respondents who identified themselves as Democrats, 421 as Republicans, and 109 as independents. The total respondents included 937 registered voters.

Er, that would mean that 51.1% of the respondents to the poll were Democrats, and 38.8% were Republicans. Now, I grant you that Republicans have been slightly overrepresented in this sample, as the 2010 exit polls showed 35% of voters were Republicans. However, Democrats also only comprised 35% of the vote that year, not 51.1%, and only 39% the year Obama won election.

So the big news for Obama is that in a poll that consists of 51.1% Democrats, he gets a 50% approval rating? Yeah, that’s a boost, all right. And Reuters needs to go back to polling school.

[ScottinVA]

I know.. but it’s not just that one... there are others in the past day or two as well.

[SeekAndFind]

RE: but it’s not just that one... there are others in the past day or two as well.

And what are their internals?

[USS Alaska]

Many voters do not want to be seen as rejecting the first black president.

A tomato can will beat obama in November, in a landslide and the demonRATS are going to get crushed in the house, the senate and in the state house and gubbernors around the Country.

The msm is going to be so morose that conservatives will be convulsing from laughter and glee.

I don't care which pubbie ends up as the candidate, {I have my favorite but it won't matter} obummer is a one term pResident.

His fat assed greedy bitch wife can go back to her $300K a year job in Chicago and he can go back to his coke and fag blow jobs.

[MrB]

Actually, it’s pretty funny that their 51% overweighted democrat poll only gave him a 50% approval rating.

Then again, they probably knew that 50% was what they wanted as the outcome, and “adjusted” their sample accordingly.

[Pining_4_TX]

Ha, ha, tell us how you really feel! ;-)

[AngelesCrestHighway]

Economy DENTS Obama's poll numbers?...