Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Hojczyk

There are a couple of refineries in Washington state. Just wondering why they don’t run the pipe line that way? It would also be a hell of a lot shorter. Anybody have any ideas on that?


7 posted on 03/14/2012 12:45:38 PM PDT by navyblue (<u>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: navyblue

Compare the output of those refineries in Washington state with those in the Houston area and those in the Beaumont-Nederland-Port Arthur area.


9 posted on 03/14/2012 12:55:27 PM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: navyblue
There are a couple of refineries in Washington state. Just wondering why they don’t run the pipe line that way?

There are 5 refineries in Washington running a total of 613,150 Barrels Per Day. All but ~10% of that oil is already supplied by North American sources, mostly Alaska. So they import from overseas ~60,000 BPD.

http://www.commerce.wa.gov/_CTED/documents/ID_2921_Publications.pdf

What would they do with another 710,000 BPD?

It would also be a hell of a lot shorter.

It would also cross the Rocky Mountains. You can cross a lot of miles of flat land for the cost of a mile through the Rocky Mountains.

The Gulf Coast area refineries import millions of barrels per day of oil from overseas. We could use the existing refineries, with the existing gasoline, diesel, etc distribution pipelines by just replacing some of the imported oil and extending one crude oil pipeline.

13 posted on 03/14/2012 1:13:09 PM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson