Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Romney’s Delegate Lead Grows
The Washington Post ^ | March 14, 2012 | Aaron Blake

Posted on 03/14/2012 8:40:27 AM PDT by Iron Munro

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 181-192 next last
To: NoGrayZone
I vote my faith.

You are right. People fail to realize that just as a person who drives the car for a robber is as guilty as a robber, voters are responsible for the votes cast by the politicians they elect.

101 posted on 03/14/2012 12:34:18 PM PDT by stars & stripes forever (Blessed is the nation whose God is the Lord!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Iron Munro

Romney needs to get 1190 delegates. The reason is that if Romney is close to 1144, other campaigns can then challenge Florida, Virgina, and Arizona’s delegations. If successful, Romney loses about 50 delegates.


102 posted on 03/14/2012 1:05:04 PM PDT by Thunder90 (Romney barely won in OH with a 12-1 money advantage, he can't beat Obama that way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
“Last night was proof that Conservatives will NOT vote for Romney, and he is dead in the General without their support.”

Last night proved that conservatives will not vote for Romney if there are more conservative alternatives (Santorum and Gingrich) on the ballot. It says nothing about whom (if anyone) conservatives will vote for if the alternative is Obama.

103 posted on 03/14/2012 1:15:59 PM PDT by riverdawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: stars & stripes forever
Will rise up and do what, for goodness sake? The delegates are obligated to vote for their candidate on the first ballot. After all, the primaries and caucuses should mean something.

Exactly who is this mystery person that will rise up out of the pumpkin patch to snatch the nomination? And where will their delegates come from?

If you label what you wrote as fantasy, I would gladly welcome and accept it, but there is no reality to your comment.

104 posted on 03/14/2012 1:21:41 PM PDT by Dave W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie
You are confused. Winning 46% of the delegates is not the same as winning 46% of the vote. Some of the remaining states are winner take all. Romney can win with a plurality of 30% and take all the delegates. That's how Obama won the Democrat nomination in 2008.
105 posted on 03/14/2012 1:27:52 PM PDT by Dave W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: JediJones

Bravo...the only coherent post I have read so far today. You are completely correct.


106 posted on 03/14/2012 1:32:03 PM PDT by Dave W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Dave W
Will rise up and do what, for goodness sake?

I was referring to those who vote the party line regardless if a candidates supports issues that go against their faith.

I am not going to support a candidate (Romney)who has an anti-family record as Governor. If he is the nominee, I pray there will be a third party option on the November ballot.

107 posted on 03/14/2012 1:46:46 PM PDT by stars & stripes forever (Blessed is the nation whose God is the Lord!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

many of those winner take all states you have listed are not winner take all. They are winner take all by district, which favors Santorum since he gets most of his support from the more numerous rural areas.


108 posted on 03/14/2012 2:55:53 PM PDT by TexasFreeper2009 (Go Newt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: All; Iron Munro
In other words, all of the not-Romney candidates put together have just 89% of the delegates of Romney.

Yeah, it's all Newt's fault Romney's winning. /s

The only shot left is for all of the not-Romney to stay in and take delegates from Romney. None of them can outright beat him head-on at this point. It's too late and we learned this week Santorum's camp admits it. Newt's camp knows it and Ron Paul's strategy depends on it.

If a not-Romney gets out, Romney benefits because a sizable pool will flock to him rather than Newt or Santorum.

109 posted on 03/14/2012 3:58:48 PM PDT by newzjunkey (Santorum: 18-point loss, voted for Sotomayor, proposed $550M on top of $900M Amtrak budget...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SaxxonWoods
Carrying on, the not-Romneys must win 52% of the remaining delegates to stop Romney from taking the nomination outright.

That's doable but not if any of the not-Romney's exit.

110 posted on 03/14/2012 4:01:09 PM PDT by newzjunkey (Santorum: 18-point loss, voted for Sotomayor, proposed $550M on top of $900M Amtrak budget...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: WayneS
That’s bad news about American Samoa, because you know the old saying: “As goes American Samoa, so goes the nation...”

Wow! I've had it so wrong for years.

I always thought it went like this:

“As goes American Samoa, so goes American Samoa...”

111 posted on 03/14/2012 4:02:08 PM PDT by Iron Munro ("Don't pick a fight with an old man. If he is too old to fight he'll just kill you." John Steinbeck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: JediJones

Santorum should contest MD, as it is a closed primary, and the liberals there are mostly Democrats. He might outsmart the liberal GOP in MD, but maybe not either.


112 posted on 03/14/2012 4:13:37 PM PDT by Theodore R. (Mathematically, it's all over, says Mittens. I'm afraid the people will again let us down.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: xzins

It may be that Newt will have to sell Perry in TX, not vice versa.


113 posted on 03/14/2012 4:18:59 PM PDT by Theodore R. (Mathematically, it's all over, says Mittens. I'm afraid the people will again let us down.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey

Just what state(s) is Newt supposed to win if there were no Santorum candidacy?


114 posted on 03/14/2012 4:22:37 PM PDT by Theodore R. (Mathematically, it's all over, says Mittens. I'm afraid the people will again let us down.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

California was WTA by congressional district?
__________________________________________________

OK so Willie Mitty should get same-sex marriage San Francisco Bay area..

and Obamas rich friends in Hollywood...

and the liberal parts of Sacramento..

Central Valley is full of his illegal alien buddies..

San Diego has the US Navy...They wont go for him...

What other parts of CA are liberal ???


115 posted on 03/14/2012 4:43:54 PM PDT by Tennessee Nana (Why should I vote for Bishop Romney when he hates me because I am a Christian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

Gosh Jeff it sounds like its just too hard and confusing for your boy Willard...

Maybe he needs to go on home now before he bends a hair...


116 posted on 03/14/2012 4:47:43 PM PDT by Tennessee Nana (Why should I vote for Bishop Romney when he hates me because I am a Christian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Signalman; EternalVigilance; Dr. Sivana
Signalman:

That would be too bad. If Obozo and Obomney (Tweedle Dumb and Tweedle Dumber) are the major party candidates, and (God forbid!) either is actually elected, then that winner will get four years or possibly eight years, if Obamney, to further Obozo's and the GOP-Es quest to destroy America and appoint one or two more commie Supreme Court justices (maybe more if Obamney).

Romney, once the trust funds are protected, regards everything else as quite negotiable and quite disposable. He has no backbone and no soul and no principles. His idjit son Matt was quoted today as saying that Obozo is a pretty good guy. Anything named Romney is the very definition of spoiled, rich and utterly out of touch. Mittwit is part of the problem and NEVER any part of the solution. If this is the best that conservatism can produce, we should have gone quietly to submit to tyranny rather than wasting all that time on politics for so many years.

I have never voted third party for POTUS but if the choice is those two, I will certainly refuse to vote for either of those anti-American, anti-Western Civilization, pro-abort, pro-lavender, anti-military, gun grabbing, tax hiking, spendaholic phonies. If there is a worthwhile third party candidate, only that candidate will get my POTUS vote. Neither Obozo nor Obamney have the slightest shred of conservative principle. We have a better chance of stopping Obozo's commie nominees than Obamney's commie nominees.

McConnell, LAMAR!, Corker, Cornyn, Hatch, Moocowski, Nancyboy Kirk, Lugar (God forbid his renomination), Brown, Collins, Isakson, Chambliss, McShame, and others of their ilk just MIGHT be united against Obozo's commie nominees but they will justify voting for Obamney's commie nominees because, well gosh, Obamney's a "Republican" and they just have to ratify his nominees. See Herod Blackmun, Swish Souter, Sandra Day O'Connor, Sandra Day O'Kennedy, Earl Warren, William Brennan and many other despicable "GOP" nominees.

Have the common sense to realize that, by repeating the age old "leftist posing as GOP mantra" (not your own but that of generations of Eastern elitist candidates and managers who substitute money for principle) makes you Charlie Brown in football season trusting Lucy to hold that football so you can kick it. Year after year, the sky looks very much the same when you wind up on your back after the football is removed. Coincidence? Not likely.

"Our guy is a smidgeon better (maybe) than their guy" is not a war worth fighting. Nor is the fight to substitute polo playing and a bracing contest of tiddlywinks for basketball and football.

117 posted on 03/14/2012 5:00:55 PM PDT by BlackElk ( Dean of Discipline ,Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Society. Burn 'em Bright!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

California is a Congressional District WTA, which in effect means it is proportional as well.

Romney cant win the nomination.

He’s dead in the water.
__________________________________________

Duncan Hunter was in CD 50 something so theres a large group of them...

When Romney does his attack ads etc hes going to have to treat each one like a separate state...

He cant reach them all to fool them

some of those districts will go to the others

and heres something else

Ron Paul won one of the Hawaiian islands yesterday

and came within about 10-20 votes of winning another

so dont count him out from winning a couple of those districts...

Theres a good chance that Romney wont do that great in CA

Im sure his neighbors arent too fond of him where he is tearing down that big house so I dont think he can count on them...

I think Rick has a good chance to get PA and maybe TX


118 posted on 03/14/2012 5:15:10 PM PDT by Tennessee Nana (Why should I vote for Bishop Romney when he hates me because I am a Christian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Pray he doesn’t get many more delegates.
_______________________________________

Ron Paul should do well in TX his state

and in Kentucky his sons state...

We need him to pick up the votes and delegates that Newt and Rick cant get...

The idea is to stop the rabid liberal Romnry for now...


119 posted on 03/14/2012 5:20:46 PM PDT by Tennessee Nana (Why should I vote for Bishop Romney when he hates me because I am a Christian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: aegiscg47

Some people are trying very hard to deny reality. A lot of the current delegate math includes unbound delegates who will be chosen at state conventions, where anything can happen. Ia, Co, and Mn are all unbound, and Romney could easily walk away with 25 from those states. Plus, he has been campaigning in territories and racking up delegates there, as well as campaigning in primary states with bound delegates. He just has a better campaign strategy of winning the nomination than the rest.


120 posted on 03/14/2012 5:26:03 PM PDT by Raider Sam (They're on our left, right, front, and back. They aint gettin away this time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 181-192 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson