Skip to comments.
Drudge Hypes His Online Poll (Predicts Romney Wins in AL and MS)
Drudge Report ^
Posted on 03/13/2012 2:42:46 PM PDT by Windy City Conservative
5 PM ET: NETWORK EXITS SHOW ALABAMA TIGHT; ROMNEY TAKES MISSISSIPPI... DEVELOPING
DRUDGE POLLS HAVE CORRECTLY PREDICTED EVERY RACE
(Excerpt) Read more at drudgereport.com ...
TOPICS: Breaking News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: adiosnewt; backstabbergingrich; backstabbernewt; backstabberromney; backstabbersantorum; disgracefulnoot; getoutnewt; gingrich4amnesty; gingrich4nytimes; gingrich4soros; newt4romney; newt4romneycare; newtgetout; newtisromneyswingman; newtromney2012; newtsplittingthevote; newtspoiler; noot; romney4nytimes; santorum4romney; santorum4romneycare; santorum4specter; soros4gingrich; spoilergingrich; spoilernewt; spoilersantorum; votenewtgetmitt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-139 last
To: alstewartfan
Bull.... He is done when he wins or he says he’s done and not one second sooner.
121
posted on
03/13/2012 6:20:08 PM PDT
by
Gator113
(** President Newt Gingrich-"Our beloved republic deserves nothing less." ~Just livin' life, my way~)
To: JAKraig
If you really didn’t know that Drudge was cheer-leading for Romney, then you apparently lack even the most casual powers of observation.
122
posted on
03/13/2012 7:29:51 PM PDT
by
NavVet
("You Lie!")
To: NavVet
Drudge’s Romney pompoms are a little droopy just now.
To: Thunder90
As long as we hold a filabuster in the Senate, we can contain Obama until 2014 You are so wrong on that (said nicely, of course).
Obama is killing us right now with grossly Unconstitutional executive orders, refusals to enforce laws he doesn't like, and pissing all over the legislative branch. What is (any) congress going to do when the President violates the law on a daily basis, as is the case now? Nothing. Realistically, we barely have what could be considered a functioning national legislature.
Filibusters don't mean squat.
124
posted on
03/13/2012 8:18:12 PM PDT
by
ChildOfThe60s
(If you can remember the 60s....you weren't really there)
To: Thunder90
As long as we hold a filabuster in the Senate, we can contain Obama until 2014
Now there is a pipe dream if I ever heard one. Show me one single event since the GOP took the House in Nov 2010 that shows the GOP has a spine. AND don't throw up the bills the House passed in which they knew they were going into little Harry Reid's file 13. Those were gutless and defenseless acts of political theater - when in fact the HOUSE should have balked at passing a Continuing Resolution and balked at increasing the debt limit on the won's credit card - that would have showed REAL GUTS.
Must I remind you the GOP in the Senate held no filibuster to stop Sonya Soto-Mayor or Elena Kagan appointed to SCOTUS, nor has any GOPer in Congress done anything about Zero "recess" appointing other officials that require a Senate vote when Congress was NOT recessed.
There simply is no alternative but to remove Zero - he will have up to three more Justices appointed to SCOTUS in the next four years and that will change the makeup of the Fed Govt tyranny forever in our life times. My kids and grand kids are too valuable to trust stopping Zero to a Senate barely in control by some RINO Senators (McLame and his boy friend).
125
posted on
03/13/2012 8:50:51 PM PDT
by
Cheerio
(Barry Hussein Soetoro-0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
To: NKP_Vet
Newt said tonight he’s staying in the race to keep Romney from getting the delegates to clinch the nomination. He said if both he and Santorum keep getting delegates that he is keeping Romney from getting them. Since he’s a hell of alot smarter than I am, I say GO NEWT! Anything to keep the liberal from Mass from getting the nomination.
126
posted on
03/13/2012 9:04:48 PM PDT
by
NKP_Vet
(creep.)
To: Windy City Conservative
127
posted on
03/13/2012 9:16:17 PM PDT
by
Antoninus
(Goal #1: Defeat Romney. Goal #2: Defeat Obama. If we don't achieve both goals, 2012 is a loss.)
To: Windy City Conservative
128
posted on
03/13/2012 9:16:36 PM PDT
by
Antoninus
(Goal #1: Defeat Romney. Goal #2: Defeat Obama. If we don't achieve both goals, 2012 is a loss.)
To: Brices Crossroads
To: org.whodat; All; onyx; Mariner; Lazlo in PA; writer33; Antoninus; cripplecreek; CharlesWayneCT
47 posted on Tuesday, March 13, 2012 5:45:18 PM by org.whodat: “I do not get this convention crap, whoever walks into the convention with the biggest number will win. Tell me when it did not happen.”
The 1920 election, which Newt Gingrich has been citing, is one example of the frontrunner losing. There have been more recent brokered conventions, the most recent a half-century ago. However, if it were not for the superdelegates, the 2008 Democratic Party race would have been a brokered convention. Essentially we had a smoke-filled room in the weeks between the end of the primaries and the beginning of the convention, with party insiders pressured to say who they would support to avoid a brokered convention.
Back to 1920: in that year, the Republican frontrunner was Maj. Gen. Leonard Wood, a Medal of Honor recipient for personal bravery during the Indian wars in the American Southwest. He was a military medical doctor who revitalized the Cuban health system after the American conquest and during World War II was a key expert and innovator in military training. He was also vilified by Mark Twain for atrocities against the Muslims in the Philippines, since he believed the only way to defeat the Islamic insurrection against America was to use tactics that even Sherman didn't use in Georgia.
The Republicans ditched him in convention and replaced him with a presidential nominee who generated scandal after scandal for the party. Republicans exchanged a properly vetted candidate with known problems for a new face whose problems proved to be far worse. That's a very real risk if you get a candidate without proper vetting in a primary. If it hadn't been for Calvin Coolidge as vice-president, a man known for strict honestly, the Warren Harding nomination would have been a disaster for Republicans.
That should be a very strong warning to Republicans who want to go to convention and replace Romney with some other moderate Republican, and the same for conservatives who want to get a conservative candidate who is not Gingrich or Santorum.
BTW, I live outside Fort Leonard Wood, which was named for Maj. Gen. Leonard Wood long after his death.
To: org.whodat; All; onyx; Mariner; Lazlo in PA; writer33; Antoninus; cripplecreek; CharlesWayneCT
Bad typo. MG Leonard Wood was dead by World War II. I meant World War I.
Back to Drudge: I hope this is a warning that early polls can be wrong, especially in close elections. Polls have value but they are not infallible.
To: NKP_Vet; Longbow1969; All
58 posted on Tuesday, March 13, 2012 5:59:18 PM by NKP_Vet: “CNN has the exit polls plastered all over their ticker tape. They started doing this hours before the polls are due to close. It should be against the law.”
I hate this as much as you do.
However, passing a law regulating non-broadcast media would be unconstitutional. While broadcast stations are subject to federal licensing regulations determining who can put up a transmission tower, the government has no constitutional right to regulate print media in any way, and the same should be true for cable and internet operations.
I'm well aware that CNN and FOX fear the possibility of an adverse court ruling and they act as if they were broadcast outlets, plus FOX has broadcast affiliates and has to worry about issues in that area.
However, Drudge cannot be controlled under current law. Any legal efforts to regulate Drudge would also be able to regulate Free Republic. I think we all understand the risks if Clinton or Obama could regulate what we do on Free Republic.
To: Windy City Conservative
So its better that a guy like Drudge declares a winner 3 hours before the polls close, and influence those who havent voted yet, to just go straight home after work and not bother voting because there already is a winner.Anyone who goes home and skips voting because of what Drudge says is too stupid to be entrusted with a vote. It's better that they stay home.
133
posted on
03/14/2012 5:56:57 AM PDT
by
pgkdan
(Rick Santorum 2012. Conservative's last, best chance!)
To: darrellmaurina
Yep, just your typical everyday event. LOL,
To: Windy City Conservative
Wow, he’s got a big omelet on his face.
135
posted on
03/14/2012 6:34:45 AM PDT
by
MNDude
To: Windy City Conservative
Drudge Hypes His Online Poll (Predicts Romney Wins in AL and MS)....DRUDGE POLLS HAVE CORRECTLY PREDICTED EVERY RACEHey Matt. You suck.
In O! So many ways.
136
posted on
03/14/2012 6:40:29 AM PDT
by
Lazamataz
("We beat the Soviet Union, then we became them." -- Lazamataz, 2005)
To: Windy City Conservative
How’d that work out for him? lol
137
posted on
03/15/2012 3:35:23 AM PDT
by
GeronL
(The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
To: JAKraig
a voice of reason...how refreshing :-)
138
posted on
03/17/2012 7:02:14 AM PDT
by
southphilly
(All States should be right to work States)
To: sand88
he wasn’t a pig when he disclosed “the blue dress”
139
posted on
03/17/2012 7:06:43 AM PDT
by
southphilly
(All States should be right to work States)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-139 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson