To: 21twelve; Absolutely Nobama; AFPhys; afraidfortherepublic; AmericanInTokyo; ...
2 posted on
03/10/2012 12:44:54 PM PST by
Antoninus
(Goal #1: Defeat Romney. Goal #2: Defeat Obama. If we don't achieve both goals, 2012 is a loss.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
ROTFLMYromneyOFF!
3 posted on
03/10/2012 12:46:24 PM PST by
onyx
(SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC, DONATE MONTHLY. If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, let me know.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Mitt Romney trailed with 18 percent Hey FoxNews -- here's your story:
82% of Kansas caucus voters DO NOT WANT MITT ROMNEY!
4 posted on
03/10/2012 12:49:40 PM PST by
meadsjn
(Sarah 2012, or sooner)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
He ain’t Newt but as a born and raised Kansan, I’ll take Rick over mit any day.
5 posted on
03/10/2012 12:50:07 PM PST by
moehoward
To: Oldeconomybuyer
To: Oldeconomybuyer
My guess would be that Romney will make the 20% threshold as he is at (52 - 16 = 36) 36% now. He may drop some but appears to share the statewide/bonus delegates.
http://www.thegreenpapers.com/P12/KS-R#0310
25 delegates (10 base at-large delegates and 15 bonus delegates) to the Republican National Convention are proportionally allocated to presidential contenders based on the statewide vote. A 20% threshold is required in order for a presidential contender to be allocated National Convention delegates. However, if only one candidate or no candidate receives the 20%, there is no threshold.
[the percentage of votes received] = [votes cast for each candidate] ÷ [total votes cast for all candidates meeting the threshold].
Beginning with the candidate who received the most votes, multiply [the percentage of votes received] by [25 National Convention Delegates] and round any remainder up to the next whole number. Repeat for the next highest vote getter until all 25 delegates are allocated. [Section VI. 2. A.]
The 3 party leaders delegates (Todd Tiahrt, the National Committeeman, Helen van Etten, the National Committeewoman, and Amanda Adkins, Chair of the Kansas Republican Party) will attend the convention bound to the candidate who receives the most votes statewide. [Section VI. 3.]
7 posted on
03/10/2012 12:52:11 PM PST by
deport
(..............God Bless Texas............)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
If Newt was a class act, he would now bow out and endorse Rick. But he isn’t. Folks, he has NO strength outside a few SE states. What the hell is the man’s point?
15 posted on
03/10/2012 1:04:16 PM PST by
alstewartfan
( 27 of 36 Romney judicial appointments were DEMOCRATS!!!!!)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
17 posted on
03/10/2012 1:08:36 PM PST by
jimbo123
To: Oldeconomybuyer
We were there, voted for Rick.
18 posted on
03/10/2012 1:10:39 PM PST by
cotton
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Why won’t Santorum release his fathers naturalization documents? Why is this question not being asked and answered? Is he another Obama?
To: Oldeconomybuyer
It's Obama or Rick
America take your pick
no crypto-Lefty like Mitt
and Newt Gingrich sure ain't it
can save our beloved land
from Obama’s tyrannical hand.
21 posted on
03/10/2012 1:19:52 PM PST by
Happy Rain
("Better add another wing to The White House cause the Santorum clan is coming.")
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Rick should drop out and give his delegates to Newt.
Just want to be first at something. </sarcasm>
![](http://www.sondrakistan.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/joe_btfsplk.jpg)
26 posted on
03/10/2012 1:27:04 PM PST by
itsahoot
(Tag lines are a waste of bandwidth, as are my comments.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
This is almost as exciting as Romney’s wins in Guam and the Northern Mariana Island. Both foregone conclusions.
36 posted on
03/10/2012 2:03:02 PM PST by
newzjunkey
(Santorum: 18-point loss, voted for Sotomayor, proposed $550M on top of $900M Amtrak budget...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson