Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SJackson

Why is it always thought to be “derogatory” to name something after somebody.

Would they call them the Cleveland Indians if they despised Indians? I don’t think so.

If they want to change the name, how about Jewel Pond? A tiny bit of brightness in a drab neighborhood?


17 posted on 03/08/2012 6:07:14 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Cicero
Why is it always thought to be “derogatory” to name something after somebody.

Would they call them the Cleveland Indians if they despised Indians? I don’t think so.

I've been asking that question ever since Stanford University dropped the name "Indians" in 1972. I believe the real reason behind the objection to these names is that since real "white racism" has all but vanished, liberals are looking for something to complain about.

21 posted on 03/08/2012 6:18:59 PM PST by Fiji Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: Cicero

24 posted on 03/08/2012 6:31:18 PM PST by re_nortex (DP...that's what I like about Texas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: Cicero

I don’t think there’s any question that the original name of the pond was meant to be derogatory. Which is no reason to erase history.


28 posted on 03/08/2012 6:45:08 PM PST by SJackson (The Pilgrims Doing the jobs Native Americans wouldn't do !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson