As an old investigative reporter, I still want names, dates, places, etc.
While one can write what Roth and Hagmann said, you need more than “he said, she said” when dealing with Obama and his marxist minions.
Breitbart understood this and tried his best to present physical proof-documentation-evidence. That he used this investigative technique is a credit to his integrity, and will be one of his longest lasting legacies to younger journalists.
Why don't you make some phone calls and get back with us?
Read his comments further down the page: http://www.crimefilenews.com/2012/03/eyewitness-speaks-out-about-andrew.html
And Breitbart is gone. One of the very few who stood up and spoke up with courage.
The witnesses are scared for their lives. Breitbart was fearless and he’s dead now. Hagman said that he couldn’t make the signed statement he received from a talk show host public because the source was fearful.
Another link I gave in a recent post says that Glenn Beck left Fox because he couldn’t provide protection for the lower-level staffers who were being repeatedly threatened by Soros thugs and Fox refused to protect them. Somebody on the Fox Board of Directors is in thick with Soros’ money so they were dictating what Beck could and couldn’t say.
When I was trying to figure out the credibility of Hagman’s claims I constructed a timeline of pertinent events, and what I saw convinced me that his claims were not only credible but that the same threats were basically made PUBLICLY by Media Matters when they said in an interview with Ben Smith that they were conducting “guerilla warfare” on Fox to destroy NewsCorp through BRITISH regulators, right after Sean Hannity agreed with Donald Trump on Obama needing to present his BC. Media Matters has been monitoring exactly how slavish each on-air personality (but especially Hannity) have been in their treatment of Obama’s eligibility issue. They’ve noted every veiled attempt to not lick Soros’ feet in a stalking manner. When you actually see the timeline it is nauseating.
And I have it from a very good source that Hagman dropped the story after that Laurie Roth interview because one of his informants was killed and he was very afraid for a particularly vulnerable informant.
I don’t know if Arpaio can put that informant in a witness protection program, or if that would have to be done at a federal level - in which case it would be Eric Holder providing a “bodyguard” to protect a critical informant from his own thugs. Not good. And yes, that is the level we’re at right now.