Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Osage Orange

I did listen and he is right in that, it is a tactic of the left to name call the way he did and that he should not sink to the left’s level of personal attack.

He and you and others can spin it however you like, it was an apology brought on by outside forces and that is my uneasiness in regards to it.

No one is perfect and we are fortunate to have one such as Rush on our side, but we are in the fight of our lives and we need our warriors to be warriors and not apologists.

His mistake was in making it personal and I didn’t hear him say that was his mistake, but rather that he used words that were inappropriate. They were not inappropriate to the argument, they were inappropriate in that they were directed at her and not at the nameless faceless “friends” she claimed on whose behalf she claimed to be testifying.

I would like to have him explore the subject of why those words are offensive to the left who believe that sex with an unlimited number of partners of all ages and genders is good and to be encouraged.

I am disappointed, but still a supporter and listener and eager student of the Limbaugh institute of conservative study.


115 posted on 03/05/2012 1:21:17 PM PST by Jvette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]


To: Jvette

there are 117 thousand companies lining up to get advertising with Rush. a lot of them being conservative owned companies. Rush commented on the companies who chose politics over profit. and he held back as laugh as he said by....

IOWs... you’re wrong. He had NO reason to apologize. If it was for Fluke and a possible lawsuit, it was already said and it would have been useless. His advertisers was have been the same thing. not one decided to stay because he said he was sorry.... not one. he apologized for the reason he said he did.


137 posted on 03/05/2012 3:40:36 PM PST by sit-rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies ]

To: Jvette
His mistake was in making it personal and I didn’t hear him say that was his mistake, but rather that he used words that were inappropriate.

Oh?

For over 20 years, I have illustrated the absurd with absurdity, three hours a day, five days a week. In this instance, I chose the wrong words in my analogy of the situation. I did not mean a personal attack on Ms. Fluke.

It seems to me that he DOES acknowledge making it personal, but it was not his INTENTION to do so.

157 posted on 03/05/2012 6:46:02 PM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson