Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: freeangel

I understand what you are saying and I seriously respect that. But the point is that Pennsylvanians voted down “right to work”. They didn’t want that, at that time. I can’t imagine him going to Washington and voting for something against the wishes of the populous. Obviously not 100 percent of Pennsylvanians wanted this but somehow the majority did.

Today perhaps it would be different. Pennsylvanians knew about the steel industry of the 60’s and the coal industry too on the Eastern portion of the state.

Look regardless of everything, Santorum would be a better President than Obama and Romney. If we are not strategic we are going to end up with Romney. That is scary right there.

Newt should never have taken the entire month of February off. That was not a good tactical move. He basically has not participated in a primary since January 21st. That is a lifetime in politics. Had he participated in some of these states that he arrogantly called “beauty pageants”, he could be the one knocking Romney off, but he made his own choices.


16 posted on 03/05/2012 5:17:16 AM PST by napscoordinator (A moral principled Christian with character is the frontrunner! Congrats Santorum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: napscoordinator

I will vote for either Newt or Santorum when and if the time comes. That doesn’t mean I love either one of them, but ABR for me.


17 posted on 03/05/2012 5:26:10 AM PST by freeangel ( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson