They can do it here with Commiecare™, why not overseas?
To: Libloather
I suspect that this will be a convenience for the current administration in ridding itself of "troublesome" citizens. When it is provable that the person thereby eliminated is innocent, a "heartfelt oops" will be issued.
Sounds conspiratorial, doesn't it. Just wait!
2 posted on
03/04/2012 4:56:53 PM PST by
davisfh
To: Libloather
Imagine if George W. Bush had done this. Oh the furore.
3 posted on
03/04/2012 5:01:39 PM PST by
HiTech RedNeck
(Sometimes progressives find their scripture in the penumbra of sacred bathroom stall writings (Tzar))
To: Libloather
While I care about terrorism, I do not like the idea of an ‘administration’ determining what “terrorism” is.
Especially with the ‘stockpiling food = domestic terror’ crap the DHS has spewed lately.
5 posted on
03/04/2012 5:13:28 PM PST by
autumnraine
(America how long will you be so deaf and dumb to the tumbril wheels carrying you to the guillotine?)
To: Libloather
As an enemy of the 0bama regime, I have to ask:
Who decides who will be eliminated? Emperor Hussein I ?
8 posted on
03/04/2012 5:17:51 PM PST by
The Sons of Liberty
(Psalm 109:8 Let his days be few and let another take his office. - Mene, Mene, Tekel, Upharsin)
To: Libloather
Technically, Andrew Breibart wasn’t actually overseas ... but that’s a mere technicality.
10 posted on
03/04/2012 5:46:29 PM PST by
ClearCase_guy
("And the public gets what the public wants" -- The Jam)
To: Libloather
great...we can kill ‘em but we can't eavesdrop on their phone conversations...
12 posted on
03/04/2012 7:39:05 PM PST by
stylin19a
(time to Obamanos)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson