Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: South40; All

I don’t agree with Rush Limbaugh’s apology. My disagreement stems from the fact that he made an apology at all. He should have stood his ground and stuck by the original words that he uttered. To “roll over” and try to satisfy these leftists is totally unacceptable. Were she not a slut, she would not have made the ridiculous statements that she made in public.


10 posted on 03/04/2012 11:04:10 AM PST by davisfh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: davisfh
I don’t agree with Rush Limbaugh’s apology.

I don't either. That being said, I think he should have stopped at the "slut" thing,and not said any more,unless he was asked to elaborate,and then he could have simply made the point that she admitted it herself by announcing to the world that she was having so much sex she couldn't afford her birth control. Instead,he went further by saying she should "make a sex tape"....oops.

His apology should have gone something like,"Look,she put herself out there as such,and I simply reaffirmed what she herself had said. I stand by those words.The other stuff,ok,I was having a little too much fun,I guess,and I apologize for that."
21 posted on 03/04/2012 11:18:13 AM PST by gimme1ibertee (If you want to kick a tiger in the ass, you better have a plan for dealing with his teeth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: davisfh

I agree Rush had no personal need to apologize

He could have easily taken the them to a different level - and point out how this “poor girl” embarrassed herself was prostituted by the likes of Pelosi for a cheap political campaign.


22 posted on 03/04/2012 11:20:40 AM PST by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: davisfh

“To “roll over” and try to satisfy these leftists is totally unacceptable. Were she not a slut, she would not have made the ridiculous statements that she made in public.”

Rush didn’t roll over to satisfy leftists. that’s absurd. He apologized because he made a gross business error. He cannot fund his empire on donations. He needs major bucks from advertisers to stay on the air. He’s hoping he didn’t go too far this time and an apology will be enough. He has no evidence to prove anything against that silly woman. I would imagine a major settlement is being arranged as we speak. If he loses markets, he’ll find a way to be on the air somewhere, but it won’t be the same.


26 posted on 03/04/2012 11:27:44 AM PST by FryingPan101 (Good-bye, Andrew. Thank you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: davisfh

But she’s not a slut. She is a 30-year old shill who presented herself as a twenty-three year old slut.


38 posted on 03/04/2012 12:32:21 PM PST by RobbyS (Christus rex.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson