Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/02/2012 7:23:14 PM PST by MetaThought
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: MetaThought
But you knew that already, if you are a homo...

Well...

2 posted on 03/02/2012 7:26:53 PM PST by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MetaThought

It is sad they define sexual success as the most partners.

God defines it differently.


3 posted on 03/02/2012 7:38:58 PM PST by Persevero (Homeschooling for Excellence since 1992)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MetaThought

4 posted on 03/02/2012 7:45:13 PM PST by Beowulf9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MetaThought

Or Ladies Love Oulaws

Stupidly, but so.


5 posted on 03/02/2012 7:47:05 PM PST by smalltownslick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MetaThought

My own knowledge of too many women further underscores this finding. Unfortunately, my heart hurt was hurt too many times as I witnessed prior “nice” girls hook up with such lowlifes.


7 posted on 03/02/2012 7:56:40 PM PST by ConservativeMind ("Humane" = "Don't pen up pets or eat meat, but allow infanticide, abortion, and euthanasia.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MetaThought
It's often true.

And back in my youth, I always loved getting the last laugh when some "bad boy" tries to make himself look tough at my expense.

9 posted on 03/02/2012 8:06:16 PM PST by Darren McCarty (Time for brokered convention)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MetaThought

12 posted on 03/02/2012 8:40:04 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MetaThought

ping


13 posted on 03/02/2012 8:49:18 PM PST by deweyfrank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MetaThought

“He goes on to point out that in studies of polygamous societies, men who have killed tend to have more wives, and that even in the 21st century, testosterone levels correlate with status in organizations such as the U.S. Army. (But not in the U.S. job force: High levels of testosterone correlate negatively with career success in the United States. Corporate America really is full of girly-men. But you knew that.)”
.
LOL. Good one. :)


15 posted on 03/02/2012 8:52:36 PM PST by fidelis (Zonie and USAF Cold Warrior)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MetaThought

This is The Bent One, William Jefferson Clinton, to the T.


16 posted on 03/02/2012 8:55:46 PM PST by robowombat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MetaThought
"So: Machiavellianism, subclinical psychopathology, subclinical narcissism: not exactly the stuff of a Jane Austen romance, but apparently the stuff of sexual success."

Let me testify.

19 posted on 03/02/2012 9:05:00 PM PST by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MetaThought
Aggressive jerky behavior can look very much like strong dominant male behavior, which is appealing at first glance for some women. While women like strong men, most women are not fooled, they learn to spot the jerks.
25 posted on 03/02/2012 10:07:03 PM PST by dog breath
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MetaThought

Chicks dig jerks and deny that they do!


26 posted on 03/02/2012 10:11:56 PM PST by Revolting cat! (Let us prey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MetaThought

Nice guys are confusing to a woman’s ego. The nice guy treats her extremely well but because he is a nice guy he treats everyone extremely well. Woman observes this and her not getting “special” treatment eventually burns through her dopamine load and she jettisons Mr Nice. In comes Mr Ahole and he treats everyone like garbage except for his woman. Her “I am Special” meter kicks in with it ability to keep the dopamine flowing.

Women love nice guys, they go apeshite over Aholes.


27 posted on 03/02/2012 10:14:05 PM PST by Cyman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MetaThought

Alabama tax $$$ at work, again.


32 posted on 03/03/2012 4:35:02 AM PST by rightly_dividing (You cannot put a gun rack in a Volt !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MetaThought
Machiavellianism, subclinical psychopathology, subclinical narcissism: not exactly the stuff of a Jane Austen romance

True. But a pretty good description of the hero of most modern romance novels, at least in the early stage of their relationship, before she "tames" him.

33 posted on 03/03/2012 5:04:48 AM PST by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MetaThought
Liberals generally accept the biological explanation of human sexual behavior in exactly one case: that of homosexuality. But human desire is a stranger and sometimes darker thing than we imagine, and certainly a more complex one. Those who would try to understand it must be willing to ask uncomfortable questions and to entertain uncomfortable answers.

The Comments for this article pretty much proves the author's point. Many people violently reject the findings of research in this area. They don't show where the research is inaccurate, they just dislike the results.

34 posted on 03/03/2012 5:06:46 AM PST by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MetaThought

Famous underground cartoonist Robert Crumb (keep on truckin’) had a huge rant about this subject in one of his comic books. Crumb was a self-described skinny nerd who no matter how good his artistic talents, was always being brushed aside for the obnoxious, strutting tough guys who treated their women awful. He was contemptuous of females who publicly stated they wanted a tender, understanding male, but constantly went for the insensitive cruds. But then Crumb became famous, and everything changed for him. Then he began treating women like disposable sex objects.


35 posted on 03/03/2012 6:40:12 AM PST by driftless2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MetaThought

“...sexual success, defined in the literature as a larger number of total lifetime sexual partners.”

-

An odd definition.


36 posted on 03/03/2012 6:42:22 AM PST by Cringing Negativism Network ("The door is open" PALIN 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson