Posted on 03/02/2012 6:53:05 AM PST by Wonder Warthog
Excess heat generation from our gas-loading LENR power cell (Figure 1) has been verified, confirming nuc-lear reactions provide output energy. While there are similarities between ours and the Rossi E-Cat gas-loaded kW-MW LENR cells that have attracted inter-national attention, there are important differences in nanoparticle composition and cell construction. Our experiment has established a remarkable proof-of-principle power unit at ca. 350W/kg under room tem-perature when using deuterium (D2) gas (H2 can also be employed) with Pd rich nanoparticles, producing 1479J heat, well above the maximum exothermal ener-gy (690J) possible from all conceivable chemical reac-tions (Figure 2). Neglecting unlikely chemical reaction contributions, the energy gain is virtually unlimited due to negligible power input with gas loading!
(Excerpt) Read more at anstd.ans.org ...
Active links to follow
http://anstd.ans.org/NETS2012/NETS2012Home.html
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/nets2012/pdf/3051.pdf
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/nets2012/pdf/sess462.pdf
Ping
Germans used heavy water in Norway in 1940-41(?)-
Any schoolboy knows that using heavy water with concentrated naturally radioactive minerals cause more fission = more heat
duhhhhhh.
I read a good book about this some time ago. "Eleven against the A-Bomb", I think.
Was about the group of Norweigan Resistance who worked to destroy the Nazi stocks of Heavy Water. Good Stuff, would make a good movie, if Hollywood would just tell the story and not "improve" on it.
In other news, a cure for cancer appears to be “just around the corner”.
`Heroes of Telemark` 1965
Japanese heavy water ditto WW2:
heat is interesting but it is not work .....
Ah, but this isn't "fission".
LOL. "Heat" is the precursor to pretty much every source of energy man uses.
What isn't new is the hype and hot air. So far not one usable model produced, not one.
In case you failed to notice, this posting is NOT about Rossi's e-cat. This is referring to a completely different researcher, different fuel type, different fuel feed, and VERY significant power out. The only similarity is that it is a "gas-loaded" reactor instead of an "electrolysis-loaded" one.
Note that Miley also says that his research HAS BEEN VERIFIED, though the abstract doesn't reference by whom. That will probably come out in the actual proceedings of the conference.
And in the face of constant opposition and ridicule.
"Gives one an insight into the politics of science."
Very unfortunately true. The persecution of those who dared to continue research into LANR has not been pretty.
Pretty impressive precision on this measurement. That's 0.07% below 1480 and 1.4% below 1500.
Oft times heat is the waste or by product or work already done....eg after a quantized level relaxes back to a transitional or ground state you almost always get heat....occassionally you get light-—light being the end goal not the heat.
that is just one example... and you can laugh all you want but accomplishing cold fusion is not going to happen so keep chasing
Ah, a skeptopath, and a noob, at that. I suggest you go read the peer reviewed papers at LENR/CANR.org and get back to me.
Actually, it is. Miley has published his work on the calorimetry, and LOD and precision "are" impressive.
I think his point is that it is about fission if it is the source of the heat.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.