No. Let’s not get stupid here.
Why would the question be stupid? Given Andrew’s profession and rather sudden death IMHO all events up to and surrounding his death should be looked at very closely.
Of course, as in the Vince Foster case, the integrity of the coroner doing the autopsy is critical to obtaining honest results...
Healthy 43, suddenly dying? Suspicious
Much too late for that. There are several of these threads floating around.
let's not put blinders on either.
remember, it is not paranoia, if someone is out to silence you....
let's not put blinders on either.
remember, it is not paranoia, if someone is out to silence you....
As "unlikely" as it might be for an active 43 year old to drop dead on an evening stroll, I'd still venture that is the "likely" case here.
Having said that, until that has been confirmed I don't think ruling out any other possibility is particularly wise. Many people, some of them in powerful positions, wanted Breibart dead. The left has always had a propensity for violence, particularly towards those who dare to expose the dark truths about them. While, as I first said, a simple heart attack is probably the "likely" cause, I would also contend that if the left chose to assassinate a media opponent, Breitbart would have "likely" been near, or at the top of their list.
Well this thread involves michael weiner who is quite stupid. He proves that one does not have to be smart to get a PhD.
Well this thread involves michael weiner who is quite stupid. He proves that one does not have to be smart to get a PhD.