Ah, that makes more sense. And I can say from my own dealings with Mike Zullo that he was not about to accept any bullcrap for evidence or get distracted too far from the central issue of whether or not crimes had been committed.
He knows the difference between probative, legal-quality evidence and speculation. He told me which of my evidence would be good enough for legal argument and which wouldn’t, and in what kind of investigation the various kinds of evidence would apply (most of mine would apply in a criminal investigation of the actual GOVERNMENT entities, which is beyond the scope of what the posse is doing but does influence whether they would be willing to let various government entities handle any follow-up investigation).
He knows the difference between certified legal document examiners and internet amateurs, and this was examined by multiple legal document examiners - who are trained to identify forgeries. From the Q&A at the end a person could see that there are a LOT more issues the posse has evidence about but they chose to make this press conference about the central issue, which is whether what we’ve been presented as legal evidence regarding Obama’s birth is in fact a forgery. And after having it examined by the same examiners that would examine documents if you or I were accused of forgery, the conclusion is that it is indeed a forgery. Both the alleged birth certificate and the draft registration.
I went on line to listen to AZ talk radio this morning to see what local hosts were saying about it. The guy and gal hosts on KFYI were LOL’ing and rolling their eyes about it.
They were saying nothing new that the internet crazies haven’t been talking about for three years, and who are the cold case guys, anyway? Going on to say a REAL investigation needs people with degrees in document examination and computer science from USC, etc.
Real retards, back slapping and high five-ing each other.