We're from the government and we're here to help - yeah, right.
1 posted on
03/01/2012 5:41:13 PM PST by
Wicket
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
To: Wicket
Normally I'd be skeptical, but hey, these are experts. Top experts.
I do think, though, that they ought to lay out their own personal finances for public inspection before they decide to change ours.
To: Wicket
Unions hate 401K plans since THEY want to claim credit for any benefit!
3 posted on
03/01/2012 5:47:05 PM PST by
Kansas58
To: Wicket
Would OUR money be invested as the heads of CALPERS decide to invest them?
Or would there be an even more stupid way to invest money in mob related activities and leftist companies?
4 posted on
03/01/2012 5:47:11 PM PST by
texas booster
(Join FreeRepublic's Folding@Home team (Team # 36120) Cure Alzheimer's!)
To: Wicket
Financial repression.
Main threads here: 1) If you don’t make enough money to sock away a retirement, we need a program to socialize that, 2) Because some investments may go bad, let’s force everyone into a plan heavy on government securities (which incidentally helps government funding near term), and 3) the fund holding industry is looking for ways to give you less back than you’ve saved.
Great. The lesson here—once you’ve let the government control your assets for the promise of tax benefits, they’re going to take more than they initially said.
To: Wicket
4.3 Trillion Dollars that the Feds would dearly love to get their grubby little hands on...
6 posted on
03/01/2012 5:49:03 PM PST by
Tallguy
(It's all 'Fun and Games' until somebody loses an eye!)
To: Wicket
Aren't they kind of raising the bar? I thought the 401k was originally intended to be a simple encouragment for workers to save towards retirement, not provide a garaunteed living wage from retirement until death.
I think its more likely the powers that be are coveting that 4.3t stash of hard currency.
7 posted on
03/01/2012 5:49:48 PM PST by
skeeter
To: Wicket
To: Wicket
Public Employee Retirement Systems is proposing that states, already used to running efficient pension plans, could run private pensions for small employers. LOL yeah, let the gov't run it. That will take care of it
10 posted on
03/01/2012 5:52:54 PM PST by
paul51
(11 September 2001 - Never forget)
To: Wicket
This Teresa G. is a proponent of taking all retirement savings and giving it to the Government to put into a trust fund in exchange for a guaranteed return.
Probably will work until the politicians find a way to raid it like they did with Social Security.
13 posted on
03/01/2012 5:57:45 PM PST by
rocksblues
(Obama, the biggest liar in the history of American politics!)
To: Wicket
I think Joe Biden once said while he was a Senator that all private pensions and 401K and other retirement plans are all an “asset of the American people”.
16 posted on
03/01/2012 6:01:49 PM PST by
ColdSteelTalon
(Light is fading to shadow, and casting its shroud over all we have known...)
To: Wicket
Get ready. They are going to confiscate your 401k by forcing you to buy government bonds. If you have “too much” most of your money will be redistributed to people who didn’t save.
17 posted on
03/01/2012 6:03:14 PM PST by
FightThePower!
(Fight the powers that be!)
To: Wicket
Not just no, HELL NO!!!! They would have us give them our hard earned money so they can dole it back to us on their terms. OVer my cold, hard dead body. Ghilarducci and her ilk can step off. I cannot BELIEVE this is up for discussion. Oh, HELL NO!
18 posted on
03/01/2012 6:09:18 PM PST by
SueRae
(Tale of 2 Towers - First, Isengaard (GOP-e), then 11.06.2012, the Tower of Sauron)
To: Wicket
This is because the pension funds running out of money. They have to get a new source of funding, so they are going to get your 401k money.
To: Wicket
Once the private money is in the hands of the public plan administrator, he will use that money to purchase the high-risk and underwater assets of the public plan at face value.
Thereby showing returns as projected...not the enormous losses they would incur if the assets had to be marked to market.
Magic. All problems solved.
21 posted on
03/01/2012 6:10:34 PM PST by
Mariner
(War Criminal #18)
To: Wicket
So is the run up on stories that will enable them to steal all 401k plans?
23 posted on
03/01/2012 6:12:43 PM PST by
funfan
(and his crew)
To: Wicket
The weasels want to get their hands on the assets in the private 401k accounts so those can be squandered as well. My 401k is ALL I have for retirement. If it is stolen, I'm left with no assets except social security. Others similarly situated will create a large population fully dispossessed of a lifetime of prudent savings. When you have nothing left to lose, the reaction may be less than cool headed and rational.
25 posted on
03/01/2012 6:14:22 PM PST by
Myrddin
To: Wicket
Hank Kim of the National Conference on Public Employee Retirement Systems is proposing that states, already used to running efficient pension plans, could run private pensions for small employers. Ummmmmmm....NO!
31 posted on
03/01/2012 6:25:19 PM PST by
Mike Darancette
(Romney just makes me tired all over.)
To: Wicket
Folks seem to underestimate the disaster that is Obama.
Should he be re-elected, this will be:
THE LAST AMERICAN GENERATION!
33 posted on
03/01/2012 6:26:46 PM PST by
G Larry
(We are NOT obliged to carry the snake in our pocket and then dismiss the bites as natural behavior.)
To: Wicket
Is this the plan where you accrue benefits in an account which they annuitize at retirement age; but, if you die the government keeps the money?
34 posted on
03/01/2012 6:29:01 PM PST by
Mike Darancette
(Romney just makes me tired all over.)
To: Wicket
‘Current and future retirees now have some $4.3 trillion.-—
Well they did before the government spent it.
35 posted on
03/01/2012 6:29:24 PM PST by
Freddd
(NoPA ngineers.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson