Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: POWERSBOOTHEFAN
Assassinations By Induced Heart Attack And Cancer

Does anyone know if this is legit info?

496 posted on 03/01/2012 8:19:15 AM PST by tutstar (Want pings to Aaron Klein articles and OWS nonsense?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 301 | View Replies ]


To: tutstar

I’ve read similar stuff elsewhere.

Interesting, isn’t it, that the Defense Authorization law just allowed detainment for people simply for being “belligerent”. And Obama has claimed the right to approve assassinations of US citizens who are “known terrorists”. Well.... if belligerence is considered legal proof of being a terrorist.... and if Obama is terrified of Breitbart (and needs a big story to overshadow the findings of the Cold Case Posse...) you could almost consider assassination by heart attack LEGAL.

Right?

People need to realize we are dealing with criminals in positions of great power, in charge of technology that was always thought to be good because it would be used for good purposes...

The Obama people must have decided that the anti-2nd-amendment value of an assassination of Judge John Roll was to be preferred over an induced heart attack or cancer...

This is all just speculation, but that’s all these methods allow. I’m sure there was no autopsy done on Andrew Breitbart that would show whether there were any dart entrance marks on his body, or whether a poison had disintegrated in his body to give him a heart attack. By design, these technologies leave a person with nagging doubts because the timing, “coincidental” nature, previous threats, etc are the only clues that the assassination was done.

The information you gave fills in a gap to one of the issues I’ve been investigating as well. Hopefully someday that story can come out too...


540 posted on 03/01/2012 8:49:24 AM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 496 | View Replies ]

To: tutstar

I wonder how thick cloth has to be to repel those darts. Anybody know? Seems like somebody would have to know where you were at, maybe follow you with a cooler to keep the poison frozen until you were outside and in range. I wonder what the range is.

I wonder if the cancer-causing stuff has to be frozen, and if one injection does the job. I also wonder if there’s a particular form of cancer that they favor. Probably something that is typically fast-acting and has no obvious presenting symptoms that would clue the person in to get tested and treated. Something like ovarian cancer, for women. What’s similar for men?

Also makes me wonder if the same technology could be used to get a manufactured bio-warfare germ into the public - make it look like it came from a mosquito maybe...


624 posted on 03/01/2012 10:15:20 AM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 496 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson