Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Federal judge severely limits Second Amendment rights
The Daily Caller ^ | 02/24/2012 | Bob Barr

Posted on 02/27/2012 7:35:49 AM PST by neverdem

Over the last few years, the Second Amendment has experienced somewhat of a rebirth, thanks largely to a pair of Supreme Court decisions: District of Columbia v. Heller and McDonald v. Chicago.

In these seminal decisions, the Supreme Court affirmed the understanding of the Founding Fathers that there is indeed an individual right to keep and bear arms, a God-given right to protect oneself that is guaranteed to us in the Second Amendment to our Constitution. Cities with oppressive restrictions on guns, including the District of Columbia and Chicago, have been forced to at least recognize that they cannot simply deny citizens their right to possess firearms. At the same time, however, these cities continue to erect barriers to citizens seeking to exercise their rights.

In other words, despite the victories in the Supreme Court, the battle for Second Amendment rights in America is far from over. There is perhaps no better reminder of this unfortunate state of affairs than a recent ruling by U.S. District Judge Sue Myerscough, an appointee of President Barack Obama.

Two pro-Second Amendment groups — the Second Amendment Foundation (SAF) and Illinois Carry — filed a lawsuit last May challenging the ban on carrying concealed guns in the Land of Lincoln, which is the only state with a complete ban on the books. The common-sense basis for the lawsuit is that Illinois’ ban on concealed carry deprives citizens of the fundamental right of self-defense, simply because they are in public.

While Judge Myerscough conceded the Second Amendment protects a “general right to carry guns that include a right to carry operable guns in public,” she tossed out the lawsuit, claiming that the “Supreme Court has not recognized a right to bear firearms outside the home.”

As absurd as this federal judge’s ruling appears on the surface, it unfortunately finds some basis in the inchoate opinion issued four years ago by the nation’s high court in Heller. While the five-member majority in that case importantly recognized the fundamental right of an individual to keep and bear arms — and in so finding, invalidated the District’s restrictive gun control ordinance — the actual language of the opinion has been interpreted now to recognize the right to possess a firearm only inside one’s home.

Common sense, and a fair reading of the history of the Second Amendment, leads to the obvious conclusion that its guarantee of the “right to keep and bear arms” was never intended to be limited to intra-home firearms. Unfortunately, the uncertainty created by the pinched opinion in Heller — which may have been necessary to secure the fifth vote (Justice Anthony Kennedy) — is now causing serious damage to firearms rights, as is manifest in Judge Myerscough’s recent ruling.

SAF and Illinois Carry are taking their case to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. But the lower court’s ruling does drive home a couple of important points.

First, the U.S. Senate needs to stop sitting on its hands, and pass the National Right-to-Carry Reciprocity Act (H.R. 822), which received overwhelming support in the House last November (passing 272 to 154). This legislation would treat concealed carry licenses much like driver’s licenses, through the Full Faith and Credit Clause of the Constitution, and require states to recognize concealed carry permits from other states.

Perhaps even more important, however, this ruling by a lifetime-tenured federal judge reminds us of the importance of presidential appointments to the federal bench — and the severe damage to our Second Amendment rights that can be expected from a second term for President Barack Obama.

Bob Barr represented Georgia’s Seventh District in the U.S. House of Representatives from 1995 to 2003. He provides regular commentary to Daily Caller readers.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Politics/Elections; US: Illinois
KEYWORDS: banglist; illinois; myerscough; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last
To: Osage Orange

So...I just freaked out hubby by going out and ‘checking everything’.

Two rifles and one pistol, no “safety” unless you consider “half cocked” a “safety”.

Everything else has them.

[and everything I shot as a kid didn’t]


61 posted on 02/27/2012 10:10:44 AM PST by Salamander (You don't know what's going on inside of me. You don't wanna know what's running through my mind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
This idiot judge's ruling is based on the logic process of a 7 year old or younger.

Twisted leftist garbage for all to see, she should be removed from the bench for shear stupidity.

62 posted on 02/27/2012 10:23:34 AM PST by The Cajun (Palin, Free Republic, Mark Levin, Newt......Nuff said.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salamander

Crazy salamander. Living on the edge!

You could shoot your child like some idiot who had a round chambered and the safety off. Even though you don’t keep a round chambered with the safety off.

But it could happen if you did what you never did! Indeed!

(To the ozarka ninnie, The reason nobody carries rifles in the back glass anymore is because there are so many SOBs out there who’d break the glass and take it.)


63 posted on 02/27/2012 10:28:08 AM PST by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

It needs an appeal NOW before the next election in the event
Obama is re-elected.

Right now SCOTUS is leaning in our direction. An Obama election will put another Kagan or Soto-Mayor on the Court.


64 posted on 02/27/2012 10:30:09 AM PST by ZULU (LIBERATE HAGIA SOPHIA!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Osage Orange
I think you’re off by at least 30 years...................

Technically, yes. In terms of the issue really crossing that threshold into public awareness, nope. It's analogous to the border problem; some (a relative few) saw it and warned for years before the discussion went more mainstream.

65 posted on 02/27/2012 10:33:46 AM PST by Charles Martel (Endeavor to persevere...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
While Judge Myerscough conceded the Second Amendment protects a “general right to carry guns that include a right to carry operable guns in public,” she tossed out the lawsuit, claiming that the “Supreme Court has not recognized a right to bear firearms outside the home.”

Uh, OK, I'll bite. How are the statements that there is "a right to carry operable guns in public" and that SCOTUS "has not recognized a right to bear firearms outside the home" not contradictory? Is this fsck-wit now asserting that MY HOME is "public" space???

66 posted on 02/27/2012 10:36:56 AM PST by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine

Ha!

Ever since I verified that _3_ deadly firearms are just waiting for me in that room, with *no* safety whatsoever, I’m skeered to go back in there.

They could be....just....waiting....

[I have no kids and so far, the Boa’s only figured out the rifle scopes and the pump on the Mossberg. I think levers, hammers and triggers might be a little too abstract for him]

Never had anybody break out the glass in our truck.
Maybe they were afraid the noise would wake up the Dobermanns.

:)


67 posted on 02/27/2012 10:59:17 AM PST by Salamander (You don't know what's going on inside of me. You don't wanna know what's running through my mind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking

“now asserting that MY HOME is “public” space??? “

To the cop who’ll shoot your yard dog, it is.


68 posted on 02/27/2012 11:01:46 AM PST by Salamander (You don't know what's going on inside of me. You don't wanna know what's running through my mind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: DTogo

>>“Supreme Court has not recognized a right to bear firearms outside the home.”
>
>So what other Rights in the Constitution don’t apply outside the home: free speech, trial by jury, cruel and unusual punishment, blacks not being slaves, women voting??

Yes, all of them.
And let’s not forget that imaginings can be construed to provide the “public use” for the justification of Imminent Domain. (2005, Kelo, ‘imaginings’ = projection.)


69 posted on 02/27/2012 11:02:53 AM PST by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Salamander

They tried that crap here in WV. A lot of people started asking for warrants and then kicking the DNR people off their land and threatening to have them prosecuted for trespassing.

Just because they are DNR does not give them the right to trespass on private property.


70 posted on 02/27/2012 11:03:09 AM PST by BCR #226 (02/07 SOT www.extremefirepower.com...The BS stops when the hammer drops.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Salamander

I grew up in Maryland, and shot on the rifle team of my High School. The range was in the school basement. The school sold us ammo to raise money. Rifles were carried through the halls.

The state is ruined.


71 posted on 02/27/2012 11:05:41 AM PST by Tijeras_Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Salamander
You said rifles.....and that's what I responded to. You said this was in the 70's or something like that...I said...I have rifles and shotguns from the 40's thru the 60's...and they ALL have safety's.

I have owned and own revolver's. Single action, and double action. They are in a class of their own...safety wise. I won't go into that here.

But I'd be interested in your "safety-less" rifles...What are they exactly. Brand's and models.......

72 posted on 02/27/2012 11:11:10 AM PST by Osage Orange (E tan e epi tas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
(Article)
First, the U.S. Senate needs to stop sitting on its hands, and pass the National Right-to-Carry Reciprocity Act (H.R. 822), which received overwhelming support in the House last November (passing 272 to 154). This legislation would treat concealed carry licenses much like driver’s licenses, through the Full Faith and Credit Clause of the Constitution, and require states to recognize concealed carry permits from other states.

I'm sorry to disagree with Bob Barr, but this is quite precisely an invasion of States' Rights and the Tenth Amendment, and a typical example of the three-dimensional chess people like to play when a State's sovereignty becomes "inconvenient".

It's also the same game that homosexualist NGO's have been playing for 30 years, as they drive to achieve their nirvana of criminal trials and convictions for any and all murmurers against homosexuality and their evil goals.

That said, the Second Amendment is self-binding, so I wonder why Barr bothers with an appeal to the Full Faith & Credit clause. We are going to have to do something about amending FF&C anyway, as homosexual agitators work to spread their social decay.

73 posted on 02/27/2012 11:54:56 AM PST by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Truth is, this battle will NEVER be over.


74 posted on 02/27/2012 12:12:25 PM PST by wolfcreek (‘closed eye’ mentality is the reason for our current reality)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salamander; Travis McGee

You fellerz and yer boats...Don’t y’all know how to secure stuff anymore??? Geesh!!! ;-)


75 posted on 02/27/2012 2:57:11 PM PST by stevie_d_64 (I'm jus' sayin')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Salamander
It's cool....

I await your reply to my response to your post.........

FRegards,

76 posted on 02/27/2012 4:13:45 PM PST by Osage Orange (E tan e epi tas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

***** “ Newt is the only candidate in my lifetime willing to use the Constitutional power our Framers designed for us to check the Judiciary.” ******

Yes but Sadly through all of the debates we had MSM Moderators that would never ask the questions that actually compare one Candidate to the other.

I am SOOOOO Done with MSM ... cannot wait until they are are Bankrupt (and then Bailed out by 0bama) so the whole world can see that they are nothing but a PAC for the Obama Admin

PO’d TT


77 posted on 02/27/2012 6:23:29 PM PST by TexasTransplant (Radical islam is islam. Moderate islam is the Trojan Horse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Salamander

**** “[I have no idea who was shooting over there but they sounded like they were taking out a whole herd of deer]” ****

Prolly just had some old ammo that needed disposing or selling a Rifle (just to demonstrate)

or felt the need to hear the “SOUND OF FREEDOM”

TT


78 posted on 02/27/2012 6:29:22 PM PST by TexasTransplant (Radical islam is islam. Moderate islam is the Trojan Horse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Salamander
I have a pointy stick.
I've seen the pics. That pointy stick ain't all you got. {8^)
79 posted on 02/27/2012 7:42:47 PM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Salamander

You’ve made some homepage changes since my last visit.


80 posted on 02/27/2012 7:46:43 PM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson