[Still Thinking]

While Judge Myerscough conceded the Second Amendment protects a “general right to carry guns that include a right to carry operable guns in public,” she tossed out the lawsuit, claiming that the “Supreme Court has not recognized a right to bear firearms outside the home.”

Uh, OK, I'll bite. How are the statements that there is "a right to carry operable guns in public" and that SCOTUS "has not recognized a right to bear firearms outside the home" not contradictory? Is this fsck-wit now asserting that MY HOME is "public" space???

[Salamander]

“now asserting that MY HOME is “public” space??? “

To the cop who’ll shoot your yard dog, it is.