Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

If Ultrasound is Rape, Arrest Planned Parenthood Staffers
LifeNews.com ^ | 2/24/2012 | Kristan Hawkins

Posted on 02/24/2012 6:21:41 PM PST by blueyon

Having an ultrasound is now considered rape, according to the latest talking points from the largest abortion chain in the nation, Planned Parenthood, over the controversy about the Virginia ultrasound bill.

If this sounds illogical and absurd, that’s because it is.

In a 2003 study of Planned Parenthood and other independently owned abortion facilities, 99 percent of these clinics admitted that they either “always” or “sometimes” perform an ultrasound in association with a surgical abortion. Further, it was stated that vaginal ultrasounds were “always” performed before the early surgical abortion at 83 percent of these sites, 16 percent “under certain conditions,” and only 1 percent “never” did them.

Additionally, the study revealed that after an abortion was performed, vaginal ultrasounds were also “always” performed at 26 percent of these sites, “under certain conditions” at 66 percent of these sites, and “never” at 8 percent.

Planned Parenthood even admits they do ultrasounds before an abortion: “That’s just the medical standard,” said Adrienne Schreiber, an official at Planned Parenthood’s Washington, D.C., regional office. “To confirm the gestational age of the pregnancy, before any procedure is done, you do an ultrasound.”

(Excerpt) Read more at lifenews.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: abortionprolife; obama; plannedparenthood
Another GREAT article cutting right to the facts!
1 posted on 02/24/2012 6:21:45 PM PST by blueyon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blueyon

So, planned murder says trans-vaginal ultrasounds are not intrusional but necessary for abortion, but intrusive if they are for showing a mom her baby before an abortion.

Where would we be without these altruistic, expert people that have no conflicts of interest, telling us what is right and what is wrong?


2 posted on 02/24/2012 7:58:04 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

I’m not a medical professional or anything but aren’t abotions themselves trans-vaginal or intra-vaginal or whatever this new word is?


3 posted on 02/25/2012 2:59:04 AM PST by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueyon
If a mere vaginal ultrasound is rape, what is a full-fledged abortion?

NO cheers, unfortunately.

4 posted on 02/25/2012 3:58:17 AM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueyon
That's a poor article. "If ultrasound is rape" - I don't know that Planned Parenthood said that. Where are the references?

There are reasons you'd want an ultrasound first. An ectopic pregnancy is dangerous and above a certain size requires surgery rather than medications. Gestational trophoblastic disease/molar pregnancy grows faster than a normal pregnancy and has malignant potential. But neither is something Planned Parenthood would treat.

5 posted on 02/25/2012 5:29:17 AM PST by Styria
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson