To: metmom
Just for the record that position surprised me. It was not one I expected from that FReeper.
_________________________________________________________
I've been trying to think of times I've Freeped with the dearly departed bmv. If I remember anything, I tend to remember disagreeing with bmv as he/she took a libertarian POV.
See tagline. I hate libertarians.
Anywho. We tried to give bmv a way to walk back that comment. Didn't happen
93 posted on
02/21/2012 12:47:06 PM PST by
Responsibility2nd
(NO LIBS. This mean Liberals and/or Libertarians (Same Thing) NO LIBS.))
To: Responsibility2nd
If he’s the one I’m thinking of, he was a stalwart in the crevo debates. But I don’t recall any particular libertarian leanings out of that.
95 posted on
02/21/2012 1:22:53 PM PST by
metmom
(For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore & do not submit again to a yoke of slavery)
To: Responsibility2nd
I am not opposed to libertarianism in principle, in the abstract. (The devil is in the details.) What I am opposed to is, that if someone has gone nuts, presuming to stick Caesar jackboots-and-all into that someone’s mind. That is a very anti-libertarian move if anything. Maybe they had to lighten her beneficial medication a bit for the sake of the unborn baby, but it didn’t sound like she was in danger of a suicide, and when the pregnancy is complete they can put her back on her medications and hopefully she will regain some sanity. I could see maybe also putting her on a birth control pill, but a permanent sterilization? No way.
98 posted on
02/21/2012 1:39:59 PM PST by
HiTech RedNeck
(Sometimes progressives find their scripture in the penumbra of sacred bathroom stall writings (Tzar))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson