You ever notice that every time someone rides to the defense of an outed homosexual or an open one that gets caught in some scandal or other that ‘their’ friend isn’t like every other homosexual on the planet - that they are somehow unique and don’t follow or participate in the ‘lifestyle’ etc?
I find that rather odd. I mean, if all those homosexuals, pure as the driven snow, no doubt, were such fine, upstanding and “conservative’ citizens, surely the rate of STDs in their world wouldn’t dwarf that of the hetro world. Yet it does.
Surely the number of sex partners would not dwarf those of hetros. Yet it does.
Surely the instances of pedophilia would not dwarf those in the hetro world. Yet they do.
Surely they wouldn’t lie to cover their ‘lifestyle’ to get benefits otherwise denied them by law. Yet they do.
Surely they would not put up a public front regarding their sex practices to falsely gain the trust of their voters. Yet they do.
I know one thing for sure. Anyone running for or currently in a public office who openly trolls/advertizes for “F-buddies” online does not have the common sense God gave a dung beetle. How freaking much of a moron do you have to be to claim the moral authority of a County Sheriff, while operating as an active participant in a world filled with vice.
Whether or not he actually threatened the former ‘friend’ isn’t the biggest problem. The fact he lied by omission to his voters is.
And worst of all is that in light of all the above, people are willing to excuse such moronic and contrary to his oath as a LEO behavior and defend him - as a conservative no less.
If this is what we have come to as a movement, then we are in dire straits indeed.
Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda ping list.
Be sure to click the FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search link for a list of all related articles. We don't ping you to all related articles so be sure to click the previous link to see the latest articles.
Add keywords homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list.
I haven't pinged out any of the articles about Babeau's homosexuality until now, but now; Norm Lenhart's comments sum it up precisely. If Babeau had kept his sexual perversion to himself and no one knew about it, then we couldn't care about it. But since homosexuality is by definition a mental illness and grave character defect, as well as immoral and unhealthy, practicing homosexuals should not be in such public positions, and this is a colorful illustration exactly why.
Norm Lenhart makes so many good points, his entire comments on this thread deserve to be read, I will just copy this one part, which I have noticed over and over again in those trying to push the homosexual agenda under the radar on FR:
You ever notice that every time someone rides to the defense of an outed homosexual or an open one that gets caught in some scandal or other that ‘their’ friend isn’t like every other homosexual on the planet - that they are somehow unique and don’t follow or participate in the ‘lifestyle’ etc?
seems some are so stubborn that they cannot admit they were duped.
supporting the queer agenda is not republican let alone conservative and yet a couple seem to think that the GOP should change their platform because they know personally a couple of queers.
No wonder this election is a mess when certain republicans as they are not conservative state they have no problem with the queer agenda.
The man has become an embarrassment to all including himself.
The way he has conducted himself is sick but to hear a couple who claim to be conservative on here now try and fend this but I am betting that they wanted Weiner out for those photo’s.