Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This may not be the freshest of news, but I only just stumbled across it, and a bit of searching showed up nothing here about it.
1 posted on 02/18/2012 10:42:33 PM PST by JerseyanExile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: JerseyanExile

I guess this means George Romero can get his rights to Night of the Living Dead back, although in that case a copyright was not included in the official print of the film, I don’t know if this ruling restores implied copyrights as well.


2 posted on 02/18/2012 10:52:52 PM PST by LukeL (Barack Obama: Jimmy Carter 2 Electric Boogaloo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JerseyanExile

bookmark


3 posted on 02/18/2012 11:05:00 PM PST by GOP Poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JerseyanExile

I don’t get it...Now you can get a copyright for work that you or some controlling party hadn’t applied for in the past??? Then the clock resets for copyright protection??? This was to conform to international copyright protection laws???

And this from a court that is going to hear O’bummer healthcare arguments that Congress so happily passed. Don’t get your hopes up, so to speak.


4 posted on 02/18/2012 11:29:37 PM PST by Razzz42
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JerseyanExile; Lurking Libertarian; JDW11235; Clairity; TheOldLady; Spacetrucker; Art in Idaho; ...
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FReepmail me to subscribe to or unsubscribe from the SCOTUS ping list.

5 posted on 02/18/2012 11:40:29 PM PST by BuckeyeTexan (Man is not free unless government is limited. ~Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JerseyanExile

The way I read the constitution, Congress was granted the ability to set copyright and patents as they see fit. I don’t think they need the Scotus or Potus or even in fact a particular law. Just a uniform, consistent and documented policy.


7 posted on 02/19/2012 12:46:24 AM PST by Usagi_yo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JerseyanExile
Interesting little nugget buried in the story:

Justice Elena Kagan did not participate in the case, presumably because she had worked on it as United States solicitor general.

Why not? Didn't stop her with 0bamaCare.

9 posted on 02/19/2012 1:40:55 AM PST by Slings and Arrows (You can't have Ingsoc without an Emmanuel Goldstein.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson