Good way to get the college vote, especially in a lib state like Washington.
365 x 30 days late and billion of dollars short.
Go back to sleep, Rip Van Winkle.
He appears to have money and considerable organization.
He might last until the convention.
Now we know why he’s a nutcase. Buying bad drugs. Need FDA to test those drugs.
here we go again.
back to the nutroots
Want to end the war on drugs? Control the border so the drugs and illegals can’t come in and that will solve the problem.
(The Texas congressman told more than 1,000 people at a rally Thursday night in Vancouver, Wash., that Americans should be able to make their own decisions on such matters)
So according to Paul some loser should have the right to decide to use drugs get behind the wheel of a vehicle and kill my grand daughter in an “accident” Or maybe do a little crack before he performs granddads heart surgery.. Paul can KMA.....
Big surprise, there are more than 1,000 potheads living within walking distance of where he gave his speach. Poor turnout at best and keep in mind potheads generally don’t vote anyway.
The war on drugs and the war on poverty are 2 examples of democrat wars....both are useless and suck up lots of money. Both are losers.....
Isn’t this a non-Federal issue anyway? Shouldn’t the CORRECT, CONSTITUTIONAL response be to repeal all anti-drug laws? Where in the Constitution is the federal government authorized to illegalize drugs? We needed an amendment for alcohol prohibition, why not for drugs?
Don’t get me wrong, I am not advocating the legalization of any drugs... I am just saying that the STATES should be the ones controlling these substances... NOT the Feds.
Even if Paul were elected, drugs could never be legalized... not even California could do that when they put it on the ballot.
The real argument is not whether drugs should be legalized. The real, correct argument, is WHY is the FEDERAL government doing it? And who gives them the right to tread on the rights of the states?