Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mariner
"Let's mandate that every insurance policy covers toothpaste. Deodorant. That might be a good idea, right? Have everyone cover deodorant, right? Soap. I mean, where do you stop?"

Anybody who thinks that's over the top is pathetic.
2 posted on 02/15/2012 6:58:38 PM PST by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: cripplecreek
All Santorum needs to do on the social issues is what McCain was afraid to do. Produce Obama's testimony opposing Illinois' version of the Infant Born Alive Act. That issue was radioactive to McCain's campaign and they avoided it like the plague.

I hope Obama keeps pushing the social issues, and Rick shoves it right back at him.

14 posted on 02/15/2012 7:17:27 PM PST by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: cripplecreek
Santorum’s point is spot on. Why do we make special circumstances for one product? If the government can mandate that employers provide birth control, then they can mandate anything else as well. Should they mandate that your employer provides you lunch? A car? A house? I don't think this is too difficult to grasp or provocative language at all. But you know the Santorum bashers will run with it.
22 posted on 02/15/2012 7:23:26 PM PST by bushinohio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: cripplecreek

Exactly. Most people have lost the concept of what insurance is. It is meant to cover infrequent, expensives risks like a house fire or major accident. Therefore a large number of policyholders pay a small premium to share the costs of those few policyholders who have a claim incident.

If I pay a premium to cover a cost I know I am going to have like cleaning my teeth then I am paying somebody a fee to pay those costs for me. That is not insurance.

The problem with mandating routine costs like contraception is that you are forcing policyholders who do not need contraception to subsidize those who do via premiums paid. This is economically immoral. And that ignores that some policyholders may object to contraception for religious reasons.


33 posted on 02/15/2012 7:34:51 PM PST by Truth is a Weapon (Truth, it hurts so good.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: cripplecreek

I’m really concerned about the administration’s ban on hunting rifles, myself.
I have a right to keep and bear arms, the constitution is plain on that, but no one has given me one (in a long time... and that one is long gone in a tragic gun show accident...).
After all, they are not forcing my employer to provide me one, or even making the NRA give me one for free. They seem to insist I buy my own, and jump through lots of hoops just to get one and even more to use it.
Why is there no discussion of this ban in the media?


54 posted on 02/15/2012 8:21:17 PM PST by Apogee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: cripplecreek

Exactly.


56 posted on 02/15/2012 8:35:52 PM PST by WPaCon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: cripplecreek

Saint Rick is right, but he will never be able to explain this to the American people, many of whom are barely literate.


67 posted on 02/15/2012 8:55:19 PM PST by Theodore R. (Forget the others: It's Santorum's turn, less baggage, articulate, passionate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson