Wait, so disbelieving one scientific consensus based on observations is wrong, but blindly agreeing to another is just fine? Really?
Potential money to be made = Global Warming
Huge money already being made = Big Pharma
Who has the most at stake to spread the big lie?
“Wait, so disbelieving one scientific consensus based on observations is wrong, but blindly agreeing to another is just fine?”
Global warming cultists and the anti-vaccine cultists share the same bad scientific methods.
Remarkably so, in fact.
Science isn't conducted by consensus so there's your first problem - and a solid explanation for why AGW is a hoax. On the other hand, we have decades of experience, and reams of evidence, that proves vaccinations decrease mortality and have successfully eliminated, or significantly reduced, diseases that for centuries have ravaged humanity.
Contrary to your other ridiculous point, "big pharma" (that's such a stupid label) does not make "huge money" on vaccinations. Only someone with no grasp of the industry believes such stupidity. Vaccines against some diseases are difficult to obtain because the profit, or lack thereof, doesn't justify production.
Global warming is junk science that is advocated by people who don't know jack squat, or have a financial or political interest at stake. The anti-vaccination crowd is simply made up of people who refuse to see the mountain of evidence in front of them that shows, clearly, they have no idea what they're talking about.