I don’t think raising questions in this manner is radical or extreme in any way. Vaccine proponents should have nothing to fear from an open and honest discussion since they believe the evidence to be on their side.
The way they mock and deride most people who ask them to defend the status quo is shameful.
The way they mock and deride most people who ask them to defend the status quo is shameful.
It’s also typical behaviour for herd type people that don’t want to think for themselves.
The way they mock and deride most people who ask them to defend the status quo is shameful.
That alone makes me wonder about the need for so many vaccines.
There are vaccines that are absolutely worth getting and there are vaccines that are overkill in their preventing a slight risk.
Either way, the biggest problem I see is that so many vaccines are given at one time.
In the real world, nobody contracts measles, mumps, rubella, polio, DPT, chickenpox, tetanus, all at once.
While I think that some of these vaccines are really important, like tetanus, some aren't and they should not be overloading an infant or toddlers immune system like that.