Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cato in PA
I don’t think raising questions in this manner is radical or extreme in any way. Vaccine proponents should have nothing to fear from an open and honest discussion since they believe the evidence to be on their side.

The way they mock and deride most people who ask them to defend the status quo is shameful.

That alone makes me wonder about the need for so many vaccines.

There are vaccines that are absolutely worth getting and there are vaccines that are overkill in their preventing a slight risk.

Either way, the biggest problem I see is that so many vaccines are given at one time.

In the real world, nobody contracts measles, mumps, rubella, polio, DPT, chickenpox, tetanus, all at once.

While I think that some of these vaccines are really important, like tetanus, some aren't and they should not be overloading an infant or toddlers immune system like that.

118 posted on 02/15/2012 4:09:46 PM PST by metmom (For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore & do not submit again to a yoke of slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: metmom

See, though, they won’t let you take the reasonable position. It grates on their very core you could say some vaccines are too risky, or too many are given at one time, to such a small body that has a very new and unused immune system. If you’re against mandating vaccines to girls for sexual activity you’re committing child abuse by not getting it, basically.

Nope, if you don’t sing their tune lock stock and barrel, you’re to be mocked and ridiculed and they go global-warming-denier on you. No middle ground. They make it a mission to personally destroy and defame your character and credibility.

Just look at the comments I got from these people here and I am for people taking vaccines if they want them, and also not taking them if they don’t. If you are for individual choice on the issue of vaccines, these people simply cannot tolerate that. And they revert to name calling and saying it’s their religious duty to force you to take it because you not taking it harms them and it’s for the greater good.

They are truly insane and you cannot argue with an insane person. I wonder how they’d survive if others would start forcing them to do things they didn’t want to do because they knew better, their religion supported liberation theology, for example, which justifies poor people stealing from those who have more than they do. Wonder how long they’d put up with that?


132 posted on 02/15/2012 4:35:07 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson