Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

The Gospel according to Obama
WASHINGTON -- At the National Prayer Breakfast last week, seeking theological underpinning for his drive to raise taxes on the rich, President Obama invoked the highest possible authority. His policy, he testified "as a Christian," "coincides with Jesus' teaching that 'for unto whom much is given, much shall be required.'"
1 posted on 02/11/2012 6:18:37 PM PST by Libloather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
To: Libloather
Announcing his proposed compromise on Friday, Obama had to emphasize again that he bore no animus toward religious people or institutions. He referred to the principle of religious liberty and added “as a citizen and as a Christian, I cherish this right.”

If that's so, then Zero clearly doesn't understand it, nor the concept of rights in general nor the concept of separation of church and state.

2 posted on 02/11/2012 6:22:10 PM PST by Post Toasties (Leftists give insanity a bad name. 0bama: Four years of failure and fingerpointing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

People who think Obama did this naively or without realizing there’s be blowback are nuts. He knew exactly what he was doing. Just like everything else he’s done. It’s not “in over his head” stupidity, it’s part of his radical vision of a different country.

Anyone will tell you that you never go into a negotiation asking for the least you’ll accept - you always ask for the MOST. Then you back down if necessary and still end up getting most of what you wanted in the first place.

Look at Obamas #1 position - absolute mandate.
Then look at #2 - “the accomodation”, which merely shifts the responsibility for payment without altering the mandate.

Anyone care to guess what #3 will be? Rest assured it will not be complete recapitulation. That’s not in the playbook.

Already falling back to position #2 has gained a great deal of support from Catholics and others. He’ll probably fight like hell to go no further, and if he wins, he’s really won everything he wanted.

It is evil and wrong, but it is not a rookie mistake.


3 posted on 02/11/2012 6:27:29 PM PST by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

What a pathetic puff piece apologizing for the faux christian. The media are incorrigible!!!


4 posted on 02/11/2012 6:28:39 PM PST by SierraWasp (I'm done being disappointed by "He/She is the only one who can win" and being embarrassed later!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

The man may be religious or a Christian, but his main God is socialism, communism. He doesn’t try to avoid it and end up in the middle of it according to the article, his leanings want to conquer religion and religious people. A supposed learned scholar of the Constitution would steer very clear of the controversies he has had with faith. He does not cherish religious liberty or he would be willing to die for it. He would uphold his oath to defend the Constitution and the religious liberty of the citizen of the USA. His other God is abortion as his record indicates. His words are wholly vacuous and empty.


6 posted on 02/11/2012 6:30:46 PM PST by taterjay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

A veritable choir of spinners, all trying to make bad look like good.

Obama “steps in it” because he has to. The dog returns to his vomit.

Religion is baked into our system at a fundamental level. Our country was founded by people seeking religious freedom, including the freedom to good things within the framework of the teachings of Jesus Christ.

Obama can’t make “fundamental changes” in America without getting rid of the religious component of our national heritage. He knows it and the “intellectuals” who are making his policies in the background know it too.

The thing I don’t understand is how any of this could possibly fly in the courts. When did the establishment clause become a dead letter? Obama seems to think everyone is going to just nod and sign away their rights under the first amendment.

Got news for you, Obama. That may fly among your crowd of phoney-baloney academic pseudo-intellectuals, but to make it fly in the real world you’re going to have to get rid of the second amendment first.

And you don’t have time to do that.


7 posted on 02/11/2012 6:43:58 PM PST by Steely Tom (Obama goes on long after the thrill of Obama is gone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

“What he probably needs is an office of faith awareness “...

Huh?? A new czar? A new committee?

Just wow....


11 posted on 02/11/2012 7:03:25 PM PST by CT Hillbilly (Thoughts=Words=Actions=Destiny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

I think the Bishops are pushing their luck, now. At first they said Catholic institutions shouldn’t be forced by the govt. to pay for contraceptions and abortions. Violation of church and state. But now they are moving the goalposts and saying ANYONE opposed to abortions and contraceptives on moral grounds should not be made to pay for them. So where does it stop? How about people who object to capital punishment on moral grounds. Should the govt. force them to pay for executions with their tax money? How about people who object to war on moral grounds. Should the govt. still be able to force them to finance war with their tax money? Theres probably a million other examples. The Bishops should just have stuck with religious institutions. By moving the goalposts they will lose a lot of the sympathy and support they have gained.


13 posted on 02/11/2012 7:20:24 PM PST by chessplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather
(the rookie Hussein is in WAY over his pay grade)

I suggest nobama had little to do with this decision. It was probably made by his aides and czars as nobama is not intelligent enough to handle something like this.

I've read articles about his speech at the National Prayer Breakfast. Remember, he didn't write that speech. He's incapable. It was written by someone else, loaded on the teleprompter and spewed by nobama.

This presidency must constantly be dumbed down to accommodate nobama.

14 posted on 02/11/2012 7:37:10 PM PST by upchuck (Let's have the Revolution NOW before we get dumbed down to the point that we can't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather
**Catholic voters historically voted Democratic in heavy numbers**

Not any more.

How about all the Jews, evangelicals, etc. who voted for Obama?

19 posted on 02/11/2012 7:56:21 PM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

“..an office of faith awareness..”

ahhhhh; a “Faith Awareness Czar”, that’s what he needs.


21 posted on 02/11/2012 8:23:35 PM PST by Mortrey (Impeach President Soros)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

obama is a religious bigot, a racist, a communist, and a closet bisexual.


23 posted on 02/11/2012 8:36:48 PM PST by Castigar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather
When Obama pondered the latest contraception decision

Why is a US President pondering contraception decisions for anyone but himself???

24 posted on 02/11/2012 8:42:06 PM PST by Lady Lucky (Public education -- government cheese for the brain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

Then he compounds his woeful decision problems by messing with Afghanistan combat pay.


25 posted on 02/11/2012 9:06:22 PM PST by Mike Darancette (Romney just makes me tired all over.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather
WASHINGTON -- At the National Prayer Breakfast last week, seeking theological underpinning for his drive to raise taxes on the rich, President Obama invoked the highest possible authority. His policy, he testified "as a Christian," "coincides with Jesus' teaching that 'for unto whom much is given, much shall be required.'"

Having something confiscated from you involuntarily is not a sign of personal generosity or sacrifice. Sharing and giving is. This is even assuming everything the government would do with the money was appropriate - if it is just taken from you on a line on your paycheck, what generosity does that involve? You did not willingly give it or make any decision to sacrifice the money.

27 posted on 02/11/2012 11:24:19 PM PST by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

The ‘Anointed One’ had reached his level of incompetence long time ago, but neither he or the left wing news media wants to admit it. Too bad that a good portion of the public have to suffer this imbecile. It will be interesting when a few years from now some of the real history will come out and become public knowledge. Right now more is known about Jesus then about this creature who illegally occupies the public housing project in Washington.


28 posted on 02/12/2012 12:14:53 AM PST by saintgermaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

It’s not Christianity he wants to destroy. It’s that damned Constitution and those absurd principles in the Declaration of Independence!


32 posted on 02/12/2012 1:35:00 AM PST by TigersEye (Life is about choices. Your choices. Make good ones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

The Kenyan is trashing the constitution along with religion.


35 posted on 02/12/2012 4:23:33 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather
"He's pretty sensitive to religious concerns," the former administration official said. "He often tries to not be combative."

When he's not trying to be a tinpot dictator, that is.

41 posted on 02/12/2012 1:48:15 PM PST by Colonel_Flagg (Why, yes. I AM in a bad mood.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather
"He's pretty sensitive to religious concerns," the former administration official said. "He often tries to not be combative."

When he's not trying to be a tinpot dictator, that is.

42 posted on 02/12/2012 1:48:21 PM PST by Colonel_Flagg (Why, yes. I AM in a bad mood.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather
"He's pretty sensitive to religious concerns," the former administration official said. "He often tries to not be combative."

When he's not trying to be a tinpot dictator, that is.

43 posted on 02/12/2012 1:48:35 PM PST by Colonel_Flagg (Why, yes. I AM in a bad mood.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson