Posted on 02/11/2012 7:56:18 AM PST by SueRae
Clink on the link/banner. The video feed has been very good. And...Happy Birthday, Sarah Palin!!! Anyone know what time she is supposed to speak today?
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
You said it. You absolutely said it. I feel exactly the same way, and I will never forgive the Marxist media and establishment in this country for doing everything in their power to destroy this wonderful person.
Not Newt though!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AjGhy8LVwAo
People are in denial “whoever” and “get him across the finish line” means whoever the nominee turns out to be. Sarah endorsed Newt already, and Santorum is coming on strong, if Sarah meant Newt with that line she would’ve said it, she means any of the 3 major candidates running, and I have no doubt Sarah will support whoever the nominee turns out to be.
Found this from 2009 when the mom went missing. Sounds like perhaps the guy was on the outs with Mormanism, but perhaps still wanted to honor the boy’s religion in some weird way.
************
When Josh and Susan Powell were first married, both were very active in the LDS Church, Petersen said. They were sealed in the temple. But once they moved to Utah, Josh Powell stopped attending church.
Petersen said the Powells’ marriage counselor instructed Susan Powell to set specific goals. Susan Powell told her husband that her goal was for him to become active in the church again by the end of 2009 and to have his temple recommend again by their anniversary in the spring. Otherwise, she was going to divorce him and take the children, Petersen said.
I would have loved for her to just come right out and endorse Newt, but what if Newt falters, and it winds up being a contest between Mitt and Rick? What will her endorsement mean then? She has to keep her cards close to her vest, and do her best to speak to us in subtleties.
If Mitt is the last man standing, you won't hear anything but muted support for him from Sarah. She knows as well as any of us, what he really is.
WE THE PEOPLE can NOW destroy them by $upporting Newt!!
Well, her own parents had to keep guns under their pillow at night.
Right. She definitely doesn’t want Romney. She doesn’t want the nomination “all wrapped-up.”
Romney knows exactly what she was saying.
The Establishment and GOP-E hate her and Newt Gingrich.
Rove, Faux, Noonan, George Will, Krauthammer and the whole creepy, thuggy, Beltway bunch.
Sarah speaks for me, how I think, what I feel. When the libs and our own GOP attack her, they are attacking me. That is how out of touch they are.
Don't go there T Nana....she said she wouldn't run and why....we need to let her do what she wants to do and as we've just seen she does just that remarkably well and then some.
I rejoice that she is out there doing her thing for our guys and this country now...and that's what I love about her...she's not finished...she's keeping on keeping on for our country.
Now I understand what the other poster was trying to tell me....Thanks.
YES, but do you think folks aside from us got her message?
We know the candidate by their actions.
God Bless Sarah Palin, and all for which she stands.
I hope His hand is working among us.
If that turns out to be the case, my one thought will be Dear God in heaven why, oh why, can't it be her instead?
You're right. Sarah is a true outsider, and a patriot rebel. That's why the establishment would move any mountain to keep her out of the running. They know full well that she means what she says, and like Reagan, would do irreparable harm to their corrupt constructs, if she were in the White House.
And although Newt was once a Washington power player, he also bears the same unmistakeable patriot rebel marks, as Sarah. He too, is terribly dangerous to the globalist, anti-American, ruling class oligarchy. That is why we must do everything we can to ensure that he is our nominee.
if Sarah meant Newt with that line she would’ve said it NO she wouldn't have. Don't you know what Newt stands for and his accomplishments? Exactly what Sarah was speaking about and what we are looking for in a candidate.
‘What is WRONG with us that we don’t have her as our nominee???? There is just something seriously wrong ..”
Yes, there is...
And you don’t have to look much further than mainstream media newsrooms run and populated by radical gays (WELL documented on FR over the years), and a media-centric population of sheeple that follow whatever the Magic Talking Box in the living room that they stare at, tells them to do.
SAntorum can’t get the delegates...he’s not registered in several states...it’s a dead end for him short of Newt or Romney moving him forward in his career path..which is why he’s remaining in there. He’ll have some sort of office ahead but there’s no way he can attain the delgates he needs to take this on home...he needs the states and they are not in his path.
You are on track with that thought.
While Sarah Palin was being trashed in the media and by the left, not only did many in the GOP not support her, they went right along and joined in the trashing, the majority of those coming from Romney’s camp, the Nicolle Wallace’s and Steve Schmidt. Romney is closer to an Obama clone then some want to realize.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.