Posted on 02/10/2012 4:37:24 PM PST by mojito
Announcing his support for Commissar Sebelius' edicts on contraception, sterilization, and pharmacological abortion, that noted theologian the Most Reverend Al Sharpton explained: "If we are going to have a separation of church and state, we're going to have a separation of church and state."
Thanks for clarifying that. The church model the young American state wished to separate from was that of the British monarch, who remains to this day Supreme Governor of the Church of England. This convenient arrangement dates from the 1534 Act of Supremacy. The title of the law gives you the general upshot, but, just in case you're a bit slow on the uptake, the text proclaims "the King's Majesty justly and rightfully is and ought to be the supreme head of the Church of England." That's to say, the sovereign is "the only supreme head on earth of the Church" and he shall enjoy "all honors, dignities, pre-eminences, jurisdictions, privileges, authorities, immunities, profits and commodities to the said dignity," not to mention His Majesty "shall have full power and authority from time to time to visit, repress, redress, record, order, correct, restrain and amend all such errors, heresies, abuses, offenses, contempts and enormities, whatsoever they be."
Welcome to Obamacare.
The president of the United States has decided to go Henry VIII on the Church's medieval ass.
(Excerpt) Read more at ocregister.com ...
Let the Inquisition begin.
Steyn pyng!
It does my heart good to read someone who knows how
to use an apostrophe correctly.
Example,”... Sebelius’ edicts...”
It is of course what one expects from Steyn.
It shouldn’t be surprising that someone who was born a British subject would want emulate Henry VIII.
The “Rev” Al Sharpton and his fellow racebaiters are the last people to be giving lessons about the separation of church and state. What does he know about “dead white male” history anyway?
"We will soon learn," wrote Dr. Albert Mohler of the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, "just how much faith is left in faith-based institutions." Kathleen Sebelius, Obama's vicar on earth, has sportingly offered to maintain religious liberty for those institutions engaged in explicit religious instruction to a largely believing clientele. So we're not talking about mandatory condom dispensers next to the pulpit at St. Pat's not yet. But that is not what it means to be a Christian: The mission of a Catholic hospital is to minister to the sick. When a guy shows up in Emergency, bleeding all over the floor, the nurse does not first establish whether he is Episcopalian or Muslim; when an indigent is in line at the soup kitchen the volunteer does not pause the ladle until she has determined whether he is a card-carrying Papist. The government has redefined religion as equivalent to your Sunday best: You can take it out for an hour to go to church, but you gotta mothball it in the closet the rest of the week. So Catholic institutions cannot comply with Commissar Sebelius and still be in any meaningful sense Catholic.
To steal a line from Jethro Tull: "He's not the kind you have to wind up on Sundays."
That's the kind that Obama thinks defines religion and the first amendment.
Maybe his model isn't so much Henry VIII but Henry II. "Who will rid me of these turbulent priests?"
That ends up with them back in the pigsty.
Before Obama's Act of Supremacy did the English language ever have need for such a phrase? "Tooth-level surveillance": From the Declaration of Independence to dentured servitude in a mere quarter-millennium.
Now that is funny, insightful and clever.
I just hope that the tooth-level surveillance isn't part of my colonoscopy.
Steyn ping and read post 6 exerpt
Obama has this fixation with being the King. He would do well to reflect on the reigns of Kings Charles I and George III...
I LOVE YOU, MARK STEYN! Then again, what were the chances he wouldn’t get it?
Becket Fund well-named.
all my Catholic mates are abortion promoting libs
Sebelius
Biden
Kennedy
Kerry
Pelosi
and many more
it sucks bigtime
On the other hand—
Santorum
Gingrich
Ryan
Rubio
Boehner
Bush (Jeb)
as well as four dependably Conservative Supremes, not to mention two more Supremes (one who fits into your grouping, and the other fitting into no particular grouping of any kind, even if he were in a class by himself). 6 out of 9.
Ping to read later...
bump
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.