Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

How gracious of Obama to accomodate religious freedom until after the next election.
1 posted on 02/10/2012 9:03:48 AM PST by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SoFloFreeper
Obama to clarify health mandate...
2 posted on 02/10/2012 9:07:50 AM PST by FiddlePig (truth is hard... lies are easy - http://redneckoblogger.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper

I heard the word around the beltway that this was all Axelrods doing. If so it sure blew up in his face.


3 posted on 02/10/2012 9:08:08 AM PST by AGreatPer (Obama has NEVER given a speech where he did not lie!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper

If anyone who can has the stomach to watch or listen, please report. Thank you in advance for your sacrifice.


9 posted on 02/10/2012 9:28:21 AM PST by John W (Viva Cristo Rey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper

Obama has the blessing of the Catholic health association.


10 posted on 02/10/2012 9:31:01 AM PST by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper
From Reuters (before the announcement):

Instead, the new approach puts the burden on insurance companies, ordering them to provide workers at religious-affiliated institutions with free family planning if they request it, without involving their employer at all, the White House said.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/02/10/us-usa-contraceptives-idUSTRE8181MX20120210

HOW is this any better? So he is going to force insurance plans, purchased by Catholic-affiliated organizations, to provide for day after pills etc. HOW is this better?

12 posted on 02/10/2012 9:33:29 AM PST by PghBaldy (Person at RP's “Campaign for Liberty”, sold "Protocols of Elders of Zion" for 3 years on C4L site)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper; Mrs. Don-o

Sounds like a lob back into the Bishops’ court.

Standing by to see what kind of return volley they come up with. Anything less than “Nuts” is a Catholic cave-in.


20 posted on 02/10/2012 9:49:09 AM PST by don-o (He will not share His glory and He will NOT be mocked! Blessed be the name of the Lord forever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper

Anyone have an online link to the announcement?


22 posted on 02/10/2012 9:53:23 AM PST by christianhomeschoolmommaof3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper
In the WRAL coverage at Obama revamps birth control policy is the statement

And officials said Obama has the legal authority to order insurance companies to provide free contraception coverage directly to workers. He will demand it in a new rule.

The emperor has spoken.

25 posted on 02/10/2012 9:55:33 AM PST by NCjim (Do not argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MoJo2001; 007; 1 FELLOW FREEPER; 11B3; 1FreeAmerican; 1stbn27; 2111USMC; 2LT Radix jr; 300winmag; ..
We the Tweeple Progress Report:
29 posted on 02/10/2012 9:59:50 AM PST by jmstein7 (A Judge not bound by the original meaning of the Constitution interprets nothing but his own mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper

Time to get Mittens’ opinion on this. He must speak out about it. The electorate wants to know. How does Romneycare deal with this?


30 posted on 02/10/2012 10:00:15 AM PST by bergmeid (ABR 2012 and ABO 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper

This “compromise” is unacceptable.


31 posted on 02/10/2012 10:00:25 AM PST by WashingtonSource
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper

The most evil argument of the libs is that female contraception protects female “health”.

When in fact unprotected female sex (no male condom) is a huge STD risk, STD’s are related to cancers, etc. AND the pill is known to endanger women with cancer, strokes, etc.

They care nothing for womens’ health. It’s just part of their “vision” that every woman be free to screw like a slut without family so as to destroy society.

Meanwhile, any action to prevent women from piling up government benefits by deliberately having multiple unwed pregnancies?

The liberals are very very sick people.


33 posted on 02/10/2012 10:02:29 AM PST by Williams (Honey Badger Don't Care)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper

Accommodation?

Try edict.

Wonder if anyone in the White Hut happened to contemplate 1) self-insured groups or 2) fees paid by religious institutions to insurance companies will now pay for the extra work the insurance companies must do w/ respect to abortions and birth control.

Surely they have the spin ready for these objections, too.


34 posted on 02/10/2012 10:03:35 AM PST by FourPeas ("Maladjusted and wigging out is no way to go through life, son." -hg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper

I would have expected the bamster to have walked this all the way back, only to restore it late in the afternoon of 21st of Jan 2013. You know, right after they drag their hung-over a$$es out of bed from the all night re-immaculation parties.

They need to get the “social justice” loving priests and bishops back on their side. If this does it then we know that this whole kerfluffle was only a show, and not based on any true religious beliefs or standards.


35 posted on 02/10/2012 10:08:25 AM PST by tpmintx (Problem: The people who work for a living are outnumbered by those who VOTE for a living.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper

Once again the whole problem is Barack Obama or his liberal clones, deciding what every policy in America must have and what everyone must buy.

Zero competition. Zero common sense. And mark my words when they decide birth control wrappers harm the environment or whatever the heck is next, they will ban coverage for this,

Or more likely they will ban the “too expensive” life saving procedures that are “denying poor women contraceptives”.


38 posted on 02/10/2012 10:09:54 AM PST by Williams (Honey Badger Don't Care)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper

It implies that the Catholic objection is about money and that Catholics can be bought off.

It’s like that old joke that ends, “We’ve established what you are, we’re just talking price now.”


39 posted on 02/10/2012 10:13:24 AM PST by Lady Lucky (Public education -- government cheese for the brain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper

We know who really has religious freedom...

http://creepingsharia.wordpress.com/2012/02/09/minneapolis-adopts-sharia-law-to-help-muslim-businesses/


56 posted on 02/10/2012 10:21:19 PM PST by AliVeritas (Pray. God's will be done. Abortion leaves two victims, the mother and the child.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson