[Mr. Lucky]

Why should government health care bear the expense of a drug developed by some privately owned pharmaceutical company? Wouldn't it be easier just to kill old people?

[combat_boots]

So, for the drugs and procedures now being developed to care for and/or cure cancer, a whole host of diseases and syndromes, even aging, those people over ‘X’ will not be eligible, even if they can afford to pay for it or have insurance or experimental insurance permission, to participate or benefit?

I go back to my original argument about any national health care: who gets to decide who gets what, who lives and who dies?

0bama Deathcare gives us the answer: bureaucrats and politicians. Nameless, faceless bureaucrats. And politicians who vote in the dead of night.