[true believer forever]

I can explain it this way - and you are probably being disingenuous as you most likely know more about it than I do: He could vote for it, because without the women the women the women - the case was so weak - the entire senate could vote against it - like Tricky Ricky did - and not be faulted. Had those women testified live - the case may have been so compelling the senate wouldn’t have dared vote it down... or the republicans - at the least - mightn’t have dared to vote against it...

A lot of young women coming into the conservative party now are absolutely appalled as they find out about this clinton stuff... to some of us it is just unbelievable that he treated a young woman that way - in the White House - and got away with it...

[DoughtyOne]

I provided a link for you.  At the very top of the information provided at that link, this appeared.

It lists the actions Santorum took with regard to Clinton's impeachment.

Here they are.

Allowed the House Managers to present their case.
Allowed House Managers to depose witnesses.
Allowed videotaping of witnesses.
Allowed the House Managers to present transcripts and video of witnesses.
Voted to allow live testimony.
Allowed the House Managers to present closing arguments.
Allowed normal trial procedures in which closing arguments were not disclosed in advance.
Voted to remove Mr. Clinton for perjury.
Voted to remove Mr. Clinton for obstruction of justice.

It was said here that Santorum conspired with Lott to defeat the impeachment of Bill Clinton.

Now, does that appear to be true to you at this point?

You responded with the women, the women, the women...

Santorum supported four different methods of women being able to present their case.  They didn't even have to do it in person.

I'm not trying to give you a hard time here.  The goal is to get the truth out.